Rumenov, Ilija
Preferred name
Rumenov, Ilija
Official Name
Rumenov, Ilija
Email
i.rumenov@pf.ukim.edu.mk
13 results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 13
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Новитети на Законот за меѓународно приватно право во однос на определувањето на меродавното право за семејните односи(Институт за правно-економски истражувања и едукација Јуридика Прима, 2022-05-12)Законот за меѓународно приватно право од 2020 година претставува темелна реформа на нашето национално меѓународно приватно право. Реформите настанаа како резултат на целосната хармонизација на македонското МПП со МПП на ЕУ при што решенијата во Регулативите на ЕУ поврзани со прекуграничните семејни односи беа инкорпорирани во дoмашните правни правила. Тоа значи, инфлација на прописи, кои создаваат определена потешкотија во апсорпцијата од страна на праксата и разбирањето на овие правила е од огромно значење ако се има предвид дека семејните односи со странски елемент се најзастапени случаи во Република Македонија во делот на МПП. Разводот на бракот, односите на родителите и децата, издржувањето се само едни од правните односи кои претрпеа промена. Оваа статија има за цел да даде пресек на решенијата поврзани со МПП во семејните односи и да ги детектира слабите точки кои можат да направат проблеми во праксата. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, SPECIALIZATION OF JURISDICTION BACK FROM OBLIVION – A NEW ATTENTIVE AND ASSIDOUS APPROACH TO COMPLEX CROSS BORDER FAMILY LAW CASES OR POSSIBLE REVITALIZATION OF ‘MUTUAL TRUST’(Faculty of Law Osijek Stjepana Radica 13 31000 Osijek, 2021-07-26) - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Contemporary challenges of the cross border maintenance obligations system in the Republic of Macedonia(Faculty of Law Osijek Stjepana Radica 13 31000 Osijek, 2018-05-05)The legal rules in the Republic of Macedonia regarding cross border recovery of maintenance have been more or less unchanged from the Yugoslav Act Concerning the Resolution of Conflicts of Laws with Provisions of Other States in Certain Matters (PIL act of 1982). This means that most of the jurisdictional rules and the conflict of law rules are now turning 35 years. Meanwhile the Hague Conference of Private International Law has provided for two new legal acts, the 2007 Convention on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance and the 2007 Hague Protocol on the Law Applicable to Maintenance Obligations which introduce new conflict of law rules regarding maintenance obligations. Moreover, the EU has adapted a new Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December 2008 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and coopera-tion in matters relating to maintenance obligations. In this context the Republic of Macedonia (as a EU candidate country) now faces contemporary challenges to adjust its legal system to the new jurisdictional criteria and conflict of law rules developed by the Hague Conference of Private International Law and the EU. This article firstly gives a brief overview of the current PIL rules regarding recovery of maintenance in the Republic of Macedonia, comparing them to the rules provided in the 2007 Hague Protocol and the Maintenance Regulation and secondly it will address the means of the adjustment of such rules in the Republic of Macedonia - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, IMPLICATIONS OF THE NEW 2019 HAGUE CONVENTION ON RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS ON THE NATIONAL LEGAL SYSTEMS OF COUNTRIES IN SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE(Faculty of Law Osijek Stjepana Radica 13 31000 Osijek, 2019-06-12)The diplomatic session of the Hague Conference on Private International Law (Hague Conference) regarding the “Judgments Project” will be held between 18 June – 02 July 2019 in the Hague when it is expected that the long awaited Hague Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments (new 2019 Hague Convention) will be adopted. This Convention comes as a result of 27 years of work that has been done in the course of this project of the Hague Conference and it can be said that is one of the most awaited developments in Private International Law. The success of the convention cannot be predicted at this point because large number of factors impact the outcome of the convention. However benefits from having an international agreement dealing with cross border recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments is self-evident. More than ever there is a need of a single instrument that will contain unified conditions for recognition and enforcement and ease the cross border circulation of judgments. Only a brief look at the New York Convention on recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards (New York Convention) provides for glimpse of the benefits from having such instrument. So what will this mean for the countries of South Eastern Europe? What will be the interest of the countries to be part of this Convention? How much are the national legal systems compatible with the rules provided in the Hague convention? This article will try to answer these questions, together with the implications that the Hague Convention will have on the South Eastern Europe region. Moreover this is of huge importance since most of the countries of South Eastern Europe region are part of the European Union or are candidate countries. So has the time come for a structural change of the national recognition and enforcement systems and how far reaching will be the consequences on the national legal systems? - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, СТРУКТУРАЛНАТА ПОСТАВЕНОСТ НА ЕВРОПСКАТА УНИЈА ВО РАМКИТЕ НА ХАШКАТА КОНФЕРЕНЦИЈА ЗА МЕЃУНАРОДНО ПРИВАТНО ПРАВО: ПАРТНЕРИ ИЛИ СОПЕРНИЦИ?(Правен факултет „Јустинијан Први“ - Скопје, 2021) - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, THE NEW2019 HAGUE CONVENTION ON RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS– BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN THE WEST AND THE EAST(Институт за правно-економски истражувања Јуридика Прима, 2019-05-09)The diplomatic session of the Hague Conference on Private International Law(Hague Conference) regarding the “Judgments Project” was be held from 18 June – 02 July 2019 in the Hague where the long awaited Hague Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments (new 2019 Hague Convention)wasadopted. This Convention comes as a result of 27 years of work that has been done in the course of this project of the Hague Conference and it can be said that is one of the most awaited developments in Private International Law. The success of the convention cannot be predicted at this point because large number of factors impact the outcome of the convention. However benefits from having an international agreement dealing with cross border recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments is self-evident. More than ever there is a need of a single instrument that will contain unified conditions for recognition and enforcement and ease the cross border circulation of judgments. Only a brief look at the New York Convention on recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards (New York Convention) provides for glimpse of the benefits from having such instrument. This article will provide for overview of the main aspects of the Convention. It will give an outline of the structure, mechanism and the rules provided in the Convention. This convention in contrast of its predecessors provides for more “soft” approach in bridging the differences between the legal systems of the west and the east. However, new 2019 Hague Convention is very important, because the transnational cooperation influenced by the globalization and the interconnection of the economic systems, asks for faster responsiveness of the legal systems and predictability of the legal outcome manifested by the - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, SPECIALIZATION OF JURISDICTION BACK FROM OBLIVION – A NEW ATTENTIVE AND ASSIDOUS APPROACH TO COMPLEX CROSS BORDER FAMILY LAW CASES OR POSSIBLE REVITALIZATION OF ‘MUTUAL TRUST’(Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, 2021) - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The indirect jurisdiction of the 2019 Hague Convention on recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in civil or commercial matters – Is the “heart” of the Convention in the right place?(Centre for SEELS, 2021-09)The new 2019 Hague Convention on recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in civil or commercial matters (2019 Hague Convention) represents one of the most awaited international agreements in the legal field of private international law. The final result is far from the initial idea of “dual convention” that will cover both recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and contain direct jurisdictional rules in civil or commercial matters. It has taken almost 30 years to reach the conclusion that full effectuation of this idea is unreachable in single instrument. However, fragmented parts of this idea have been instrumented in the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) and materialized as 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements and the most recently with the 2019 Hague Convention. This newest addition to the HCCH discarded the idea regarding the direct jurisdictional rules and opted to implement the indirect jurisdictional rules. The system created by the 2019 Hague Convention is rather very simple: if the judgment regarding civil or commercial matters is rendered in a country which satisfies the indirect jurisdictional filters provided in Article 5 and if the grounds for refusal of recognition in Article 7 are not met, then the judgment can be recognized and enforced in a requested country. However, foreign judgments can be recognized and enforced under national law or other international convention, but with consideration to the exclusive bases given in Article 6. In such way, the indirect jurisdictional rules are the linking point between the country of origin and the country of recognition. This article will analyze the indirect jurisdictional rules in the 2019 Hague Convention and will provide for the compatibility of its effectuation in Republic of North Macedonia (N. Macedonia) in context of the new national Private International Law Act. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The Impact of The UN Convention on The Right of The Child on The Hague Convention on The Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction(Нов български университет, 2019-12-10)The UN Convention on the rights of the Child (UNCRC) is an international legal instrument aimed in creating minimum standards for the most universal aspect in the human existence, which is producing safe environment for children to develop. This Convention was adopted in 1989 and now represents universal standard that determines the rights of children. On the other hand, Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (Hague Child Abduction Convention) represents a legal instrument of the Hague Conference of Private International Law, created in 1980 aimed in deterring the abductor from unilaterally choosing the forum in which the case will be heard relating to parental responsibilities and mitigation of the harmful effects of the abduction which are reflected on children. Although these two instruments are almost a decade apart, the UNCRC has significant influence in the understanding and the implementation of the Hague Child Abduction Convention and represents a moral ground for most of the solutions provided in the Hague Child Abduction Convention such as: illicit transfer and non-return of children, right of the child to be heard, right of the child to have meaningful relationship with both parents and child’s best interest. This article will provide for overview of the Child Abduction regime and the particular influence that the UNCRC has on the Hague Child Abduction Convention with notion that without the UNCRC, the development of the Hague Abduction Regime would be left out without doctrinal and moral grounds. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, „Ѕвездени мигови“ на правната глобализација – три историски минијатури(Le Mond Diplomatique (македонско издание), 2021-03)Овие три холандски минијатури оформени од тројца брилијантни холандски правници, ни исцртуваат само дел од контурите на денешниот глобален економски и правен поредок. Нормално светот е многу покомплексен, но тие не се без значење. Без двоумење овие три модалитети имаат важен удел во правната глобализација, односно прифаќањето на принципите и стандардите на овие правни инструмети создава основ и ја потикнува светската трговија.