Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/34927
Title: Chemical ablation as successful alternative for treatment of incompetent perforators
Authors: Cvetanovski, Vlatko
Cimjescikj, Dina
Cvetanovska, Marija 
Arsovski, Andreja
Mitevski, Aleksandar
Keywords: superficial venous incompetence
perforating veins
chemical ablation
VenaSeal
VenaBlock
Issue Date: Dec-2023
Publisher: Македонско лекарско друштво = Macedonian medical association
Journal: Македонски Медицински Преглед = Macedonian Medical Review
Abstract: Introduction. Superficial venous incompetence (SVI) is the most common cause of lower extremity superficial venous reflux and varicose veins; nonetheless, incompetent perforator veins (PVs) are the most common cause of recurrent varicose veins after treatment, often unrecognized. Current minimally invasive treatment options include ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy (USGS), endovascular thermal ablation (EVTA) with either laser or radiofrequency energy sources, subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery (SEPS) and the relatively new chemical ablation procedure using cyanoacrylate adhesive, which we chose as our primary treatment option for this study, using and comparing the results of two different adhesives. Methods. A retrospective review of a prospectively managed database of chemical ablation as perforator vein treatment performed at a single institution from September 2023 to March 2024 was conducted. The indications for PV treatment were >4 mm in diameter and reflux of >500 milliseconds upon leg compression. Results. A total of 32 patients and 49 limbs presenting PV insufficiency (coexisting with GSV insufficiency in 19 patients) were divided into 2 groups of 16 patients, each group based on the chosen chemical ablation adhesive - VenaBlock and VenaSeal. The VenaBlock group had PV closure rate of 100% immediately intraoperative, at 3 days, 2 weeks, 3 weeks and 1 month from the procedure for each treater perforator. From the VenaSeal group, 13 patients had immediate and continuous treatment success during the follow-up, while in 3 patients there was intraoperatively registered treatment failure (P=0.0127). Conclusion. We find the chemical ablation procedure to be safe and effective for PVs, specifically in the case of using rapid polymerization adhesive. Due to its simplicity and short procedural time, we consider this to be the procedure of choice in case of multiple incompetent PVs present, as well as in significant PV tortuosity.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/34927
DOI: https://eprints.ugd.edu.mk/35260/1/MMP%20veneseal.pdf
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.