Ве молиме користете го овој идентификатор да го цитирате или поврзете овој запис: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/34927
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCvetanovski, Vlatkoen_US
dc.contributor.authorCimjescikj, Dinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCvetanovska, Marijaen_US
dc.contributor.authorArsovski, Andrejaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMitevski, Aleksandaren_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-18T12:19:33Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-18T12:19:33Z-
dc.date.issued2023-12-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/34927-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction. Superficial venous incompetence (SVI) is the most common cause of lower extremity superficial venous reflux and varicose veins; nonetheless, incompetent perforator veins (PVs) are the most common cause of recurrent varicose veins after treatment, often unrecognized. Current minimally invasive treatment options include ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy (USGS), endovascular thermal ablation (EVTA) with either laser or radiofrequency energy sources, subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery (SEPS) and the relatively new chemical ablation procedure using cyanoacrylate adhesive, which we chose as our primary treatment option for this study, using and comparing the results of two different adhesives. Methods. A retrospective review of a prospectively managed database of chemical ablation as perforator vein treatment performed at a single institution from September 2023 to March 2024 was conducted. The indications for PV treatment were >4 mm in diameter and reflux of >500 milliseconds upon leg compression. Results. A total of 32 patients and 49 limbs presenting PV insufficiency (coexisting with GSV insufficiency in 19 patients) were divided into 2 groups of 16 patients, each group based on the chosen chemical ablation adhesive - VenaBlock and VenaSeal. The VenaBlock group had PV closure rate of 100% immediately intraoperative, at 3 days, 2 weeks, 3 weeks and 1 month from the procedure for each treater perforator. From the VenaSeal group, 13 patients had immediate and continuous treatment success during the follow-up, while in 3 patients there was intraoperatively registered treatment failure (P=0.0127). Conclusion. We find the chemical ablation procedure to be safe and effective for PVs, specifically in the case of using rapid polymerization adhesive. Due to its simplicity and short procedural time, we consider this to be the procedure of choice in case of multiple incompetent PVs present, as well as in significant PV tortuosity.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherМакедонско лекарско друштво = Macedonian medical associationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofМакедонски Медицински Преглед = Macedonian Medical Reviewen_US
dc.subjectsuperficial venous incompetenceen_US
dc.subjectperforating veinsen_US
dc.subjectchemical ablationen_US
dc.subjectVenaSealen_US
dc.subjectVenaBlocken_US
dc.titleChemical ablation as successful alternative for treatment of incompetent perforatorsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://eprints.ugd.edu.mk/35260/1/MMP%20veneseal.pdf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Прикажи едноставен запис

Google ScholarTM

Проверете

Altmetric


Записите во DSpace се заштитени со авторски права, со сите права задржани, освен ако не е поинаку наведено.