Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/34875
Title: Brain-Drain and Skill Mismatch: Can Higher and Vocational Education Bridge the Gap?
Authors: Trpeski, Predrag 
Cvetkoska, Violeta 
Ivanovski, Igor 
Peovski, Filip 
Kitanovikj, Bojan 
Gemeda, Fekede Tuli
Yacob, Ephrem Tekle
Hunde, Adula Bekele
Melnyk, Sergii
Lytvynchuk, Andrii
Anisimova, Olga
Tereshchenko, Hanna
Keywords: brain-drain, skill mismatch, migration, higher education, vocational training, labor market
Issue Date: 2025
Project: SKILLS4JUSTICE
Conference: Conference Proceedings Vol. 2 of the 51st EBES Conference
Abstract: Objectives: This study explores how migration dynamics can shape the ability of education and training systems to address skill shortages and labor market mismatches through a unique comparative study of findings from North Macedonia, Ethiopia, and Ukraine which are considered countries of origin for migrants. Specifically, it investigates whether Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) and Vocational Education and Training (VET) providers can produce graduates whose qualifications align with the evolving economic demands, and how these institutions adapt their curricula, foster collaboration with the industry, and cope with resource constraints to mitigate skill gaps which are notably pronounced by brain-drain. Data and Methods: Based on primary qualitative data from conducted interviews with HEIs and VETs, labor market intermediaries, and policy stakeholders, we employed a thematic content analysis to extract patterns regarding curriculum relevance, tracking of graduate employability, perceptions on the quality of education, and responsiveness to technological and structural labor market changes. Additionally, secondary data from statistical databases on migration flows and employment trends throughout the last decade contextualize the interview findings, thus providing a comparation between the four countries. Results: Findings show that a significant share of education institutions believe their qualifications meet the labor market needs, but systematic tracking of graduate outcomes remains a challenge. Interviewees acknowledge skill mismatches since curriculum updates struggle to keep pace with the rapid organizational and technological changes. As a significant contributor towards this is also the insufficient cooperation with businesses. While many institutions attempt to update programs through stakeholder consultation or national accreditation processes, financial constraints were highlighted to limit the required improvement. Furthermore, it is generally understood that brain-drain amplifies the national labor shortages, as graduates with relatively better skill and performance often emigrate for better opportunities. Policy measures such as targeted training programs, wage subsidies, and even active labor market interventions seem to be already employed but yield mixed results across countries. Interviewees emphasize the importance of practical internships, flexibility in learning, and modernized educational frameworks in mitigation of skill shortages and retention of domestic talent. Conclusions: The study highlights an urgent need for reinforced institutional collaboration and robust curriculum reforms that align with global standards. Strengthening public-private partnerships, greater integration of technology as well as enhancing international cooperation particularly through EU-led frameworks appears to be essential in mitigating brain-drain and ensuring that education and training systems in the four countries respond effectively to the labor market demands.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/34875
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Economics 02: Conference papers / Трудови од научни конференции

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.