Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/33447
Title: | Evaluation of Different Machine Learning Approaches to Predict Antigenic Distance Among Newcastle Disease Virus (NDV) Strains | Authors: | Franzo, Giovanni Fusaro, Alice Snoeck, Chantal J Dodovski, Aleksandar Van Borm, Steven Steensels, Mieke Christodoulou, Vasiliki Onita, Iuliana Burlacu, Raluca Sánchez, Azucena Sánchez Chvala, Ilya A Torchetti, Mia Kim Shittu, Ismaila Olabode, Mayowa Pastori, Ambra Schivo, Alessia Salomoni, Angela Maniero, Silvia Zambon, Ilaria Bonfante, Francesco Monne, Isabella Cecchinato, Mattia Bortolami, Alessio |
Issue Date: | 14-Apr-2025 | Publisher: | MDPI AG | Journal: | Viruses | Abstract: | Newcastle disease virus (NDV) continues to present a significant challenge for vaccination due to its rapid evolution and the emergence of new variants. Although molecular and sequence data are now quickly and inexpensively produced, genetic distance rarely serves as a good proxy for cross-protection, while experimental studies to assess antigenic differences are time consuming and resource intensive. In response to these challenges, this study explores and compares several machine learning (ML) methods to predict the antigenic distance between NDV strains as determined by hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) assays. By analyzing F and HN gene sequences alongside corresponding amino acid features, we developed predictive models aimed at estimating antigenic distances. Among the models evaluated, the random forest (RF) approach outperformed traditional linear models, achieving a predictive accuracy with an R2 value of 0.723 compared to only 0.051 for linear models based on genetic distance alone. This significant improvement demonstrates the usefulness of applying flexible ML approaches as a rapid and reliable tool for vaccine selection, minimizing the need for labor-intensive experimental trials. Moreover, the flexibility of this ML framework holds promise for application to other infectious diseases in both animals and humans, particularly in scenarios where rapid response and ethical constraints limit conventional experimental approaches. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/33447 | DOI: | 10.3390/v17040567 |
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Veterinary Medicine: Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
viruses-17-00567-v3.pdf | 2.61 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.