Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/16659
Title: Digital me Ontology and Ethics
Authors: Kocarev, Ljupco
Koteska, Jasna 
Keywords: Digital Me
Ontology
Ethics
To-limited-extend fully ethical agent
Nonhuman ethics
Digital me ethical principles
Issue Date: 21-Jan-2022
Publisher: VIA University College in Aarhus, Denmark
Journal: Futures of Education, Culture and Nature - Learning to Become (FECUN)
Series/Report no.: Vol.1;15-30
Conference: Futures-21
Abstract: ABSTRACT: This paper addresses ontology and ethics of an AI agent called digital me. We define digital me as an autonomous, decision-making, and learning agent, representing an individual and having practically immortal life. It is assumed that digital me is equipped with the big-five personality model, ensuring that it provides a model of some aspects of a strong AI: consciousness, free will, and intentionality. As computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans, digital me can judge the personality of the individual represented by the digital me, other individuals’ personalities, and other digital me-s. We describe seven ontological qualities of digital me: a) double-layer status of Digital Being versus digital me, b) digital me versus real me, c) mind-digital me and body-digital me, d) digital me versus doppelganger (shadow digital me), e) non-human time concept, f) social quality, g) practical immortality. We argue that with the advancement of AI’s sciences and technologies, there exist two digital me thresholds. The first threshold defines digital me having some (rudimentarily) form of consciousness, free will, and intentionality. The second threshold assumes that digital me is equipped with moral learning capabilities, implying that, in principle, digital me-s could develop their own ethics which significantly differs from human’s understanding of ethics. Finally we discuss the implications of digital me metaethics, normative and applied ethics, the implementation of the Golden Rule in digital me-s, and we suggest two sets of normative principles for digital me: consequentialist and duty based digital me principles.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/16659
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/fecun.v1i.130229
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Philology: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kocarev Koteska.pdf269.7 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

61
checked on Apr 28, 2024

Download(s)

8
checked on Apr 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.