Repository logo
Communities & Collections
Research Outputs
Fundings & Projects
People
Statistics
User Manual
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Faculty of Medicine
  3. Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
  4. PHI AND MR SPECTROSCOPY AS GUIDELINES TO EARLY DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF CA PROSTATE IN PATIENTS IN THE GRAY ZONE OF PSA – OUR EXPERIENCES
Details

PHI AND MR SPECTROSCOPY AS GUIDELINES TO EARLY DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF CA PROSTATE IN PATIENTS IN THE GRAY ZONE OF PSA – OUR EXPERIENCES

Journal
Medicus
Date Issued
2024
Author(s)
Minev I
Ivcev J
Izairi A
Abstract
Prostate cancer (CAP) is the most commonly diagnosed type of cancer in men and the second leading cause
of cancer death in the world after lung cancer (1). Progress in CAP diagnosis can, in part, be attributed to the
discovery of the Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) in the 1970s. In the 1980s, PSA was primarily approved by the FDA
to track patients diagnosed with CAP, and later was approved for CAP diagnostics and introduced as a screening
tool for prostate cancer.This wide use of PSAled to a dramatic increase in incidence rates and prostate cancer
diagnosis.Today, the prostate cancer mortality rate is approximately 45% lower than in 1992.(2). PSA has low
sensitivity and low specificity for CAP. Increased PSA may not be an indicator of clinically significant cancer. The
most common cause of a small increase in PSA is Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (BPH). BPH’s incidence increases
with age. Approximately 25% of 40-year-old men and 80% of 80-year-old men are estimated to have BPH.(3)(4).
Differential diagnosis between malignant and benign disease is particularly challenging when considering that the
total range of PSA is from 2ng/mL to 10 ng/mL, where there is a significant overlap between patients with benign
and malignant conditions. The low specificity of PSA led to excessive diagnosis of indolent disease and excessive
treatment, resulting in high costs for treating patients with elevated PSA.
MATERIAL AND METHODS:The study involved 49 patients (observed group) who had TRUS prostate biopsy, based
on previousPHI (Prostatic Health Index) and multiparameter MR spectroscopy studies. In patients, an analysis
of PathoHistological Postbioptic finding (PHP) from TRUS biopsy (transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the
prostate) was performed and they were statistically processed and shown through:percentage representation,
middle value, table and graphic view of parameters. In the second group of 45 patients (control group) TRUS
biopsy was performed only on the basis of PSA findings, physical-digitorectal examination (DRP) and ultrasound
examination. The study was conducted for a period of 2 years in patients followed by the Urological department at
the City General Hospital 8th of September-Skopje.
GOAL: Determining the degree of specificity of PHI and multiparameter MR spectroscopy in early CAP diagnostics
in the observed group, Analysis of postbioptic pathohistological finding according to the Glison classification
in the observed group(6), Determination of the correlation of PHI and multiparameter MR spectroscopy with
PathoHistological Postbioptic results, Determining the criteria for the use of PHI and multiparameter MR
spectroscopy when setting an indication of TRUS biopsy according to the study analysis.
RESULTS: Of the 49 patients in the observed group with PSA valuesbetween 3.11 ngr/ml to 10.99 ngr/ml, in 63%
pf the patients the PHI was with value 55+, the multiparameter MR spectroscopy was valued PIRADS 4 and 5 in
38% of patients, and TRUS biopsy had value for BPH in 61% of patients and CAP in 39% of biopsies. In the control
group of a total of 45 patients with PSA values between 3.5 ngr/ml to 11.02 ngr/ml and a positive digitorectal
examination, in 62% of patients the findings of TRUS prostate biopsy were as follows: BPH in 64% of patients and
CAP in 36% of biopsies.
CONCLUSION: Based on the above mentioned results, we can conclude that prebioptic examination gives better prognostics and refers us to a better treatment of the patients. Patients with negative PHI findings and
multiparameter MR spectroscopy do not need to be biopsied immediately, but activlymonitored (multiparameter
MR spectroscopy once a year) and just in case of a positive finding the next step is to do a prostate biopsy. These kind
of diagnosed patients have a higher degree of positive diagnosis, meaning a positive PHP prostate cancer result.
Using PHI and multiparameter MR spectroscopy reduces the percentage of overtreated patients, thereby reducing
the cost of hospital days and the cost for TRUS prostate biopsy. With reducing the number of unnecessarily
biopsyed patients there is also a reduction in the percentage of postbioptic complications in patients.
Subjects

Prostate cancer

TRUS prostate biopsy

BPH

PHI

multiparameter MR spe...

PSA

PHP

File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

markovski, d.pdf

Size

3.86 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):e03027b0e35386522a40439023be95ed

⠀

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify