Repository logo
Communities & Collections
Research Outputs
Fundings & Projects
People
Statistics
User Manual
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Hans Em Faculty of Forest Sciences, Landscape Architecture and Environmental Engineering
  3. Hans Em Faculty of Forest Sciences, Landscape Architecture and Environmental Engineering: Conference papers
  4. Comparative assessment of largemouth bass and gibel carp as biomarkers of heavy metal accumulation
Details

Comparative assessment of largemouth bass and gibel carp as biomarkers of heavy metal accumulation

Date Issued
2025-06
Author(s)
Marko Damjanović, Darko Guljaš, Miroslava Polovinski-Horvatović, Borislav Iliĉić, Saša Krstović, Marko Vukadinović, Kristijan Cokoski, Dejan Beuković
Abstract
The Nature Park Begeĉka jama, a branch of the Danube River, represents a significant natural
asset, serving as a habitat and breeding ground for various fish species, and other aquatic and
terrestrial organisms. It is located in an environment of intensive agriculture, where there is a
potential issue of watercourse pollution with heavy metals originating from phosphate
fertilizers and pesticides. Since heavy metals are major water pollutants that accumulate in
sediments, water, and the aquatic food chain, their presence in this ecosystem could pose a
serious threat to aquatic organisms and, consequently, to human health. Since no data are
available on metal contamination levels in fish on this location, the aim was to investigate the
occurrence of two metals (cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb)) measured in two organs (gills and
liver) from two fish species that illustrate different ecological niches: largemouth bass
(Micropterus salmoides) and gibel carp (Carassius gibelio). The selection of these species
was based on differences in feeding and behavior during winter. Gibel carp, an omnivore,
burrows into sediment during winter, increasing exposure to pollutants, while carnivorous
largemouth bass slows its metabolism and retreats to deeper, warmer waters with minimal
feeding activity. A total of 22 fish were analyzed, with 11 individuals from each species.
Since two organs were examined per fish, this resulted in a total of 44 samples, which were
analyzed by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. The concentration of Pb in the
liver of largemouth bass was below the LOQ in 81.81% of samples, with only two positive
detections (45.8 and 78.03 µg/kg) while in gibel carp, it ranged from 47.38 to 669.1 µg/kg
(100% detected), with a median level of 263.1 µg/kg. In the gills, Pb concentration in
largemouth bass varied from 15.39 to 3640 µg/kg (63.64% was below LOQ), whereas in gibel
carp, it ranged from 211.8 to 612.6 µg/kg (100% detected), with a median level of 398.5
µg/kg. There was no significant difference in Pb levels between the organs of gibel carp
(p>0.05). Regarding Cd, its concentration in the liver of largemouth bass ranged from 23.74
to 43.14 µg/kg, with a median level of 28.18 µg/kg and 54.55% of samples below LOQ, while
in gibel carp, it ranged from 15.82 to 401.7 µg/kg, with a median level of 96.99 µg/kg and
36.36% of samples below LOQ. In the gills, Cd was detected only in largemouth bass, with a
concentration of 56.77 µg/kg, whereas all gibel carp samples had Cd levels below LOQ. The
results show that Pb accumulation was proportionally higher in gibel carp compared to
largemouth bass, suggesting that gibel carp may serve as a more reliable biomarker for Pb
contamination. On the other hand, findings indicate that the liver is a better biomarker for
chronic cadmium exposure, since Cd showed a different distribution, with a higher detection
frequency in the liver of both species. The observed metal concentrations are in agreement
with previous analyses of water and sediment from the studied locations, which showed that
Cd and Pb levels in water were below the LOQ, while in sediment, Pb ranged from 0.47 to
30.5 µg/kg and Cd was either below the LOQ or detected up to 0.37 µg/kg
Subjects

cadmium, fish, GFAAS,...

File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

NEW_BOOK_OF_ABSTRACTS_15th_CASEE_Conference.pdf

Size

1.8 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):dafaa585fcb63798f2fc21563436135f

⠀

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify