A review of occupational disease surveillance systems in Modernet countries
Journal
Occupational Medicine
Date Issued
2015-10
Author(s)
M. Carder
L. Bensefa-Colas
S. Mattioli
P. Noone
M. Valenty
M. Telle-Lamberton
DOI
10.1093/occmed/kqv081
Abstract
Background
To improve occupational health public policies and to facilitate coordinated research within the European Union to reduce the incidence of occupational diseases (ODs), it is important to know what OD surveillance systems exist and how they compare. Monitoring trends in occupational diseases and tracing new and emerging risks in a network (Modernet) participants are well placed to provide this information as most either contribute data to and/or are involved in the management of OD systems.
Aims
To identify and describe OD surveillance systems in Modernet countries with the longer-term objective of identifying a core template to be used on a large scale.
Methods
A questionnaire sent to Modernet participants, seeking structured information about the OD surveillance system(s) in their country.
Results
Overall 14 countries (70%) provided information for 33 OD systems, among them 11 compensation-based (CB) systems. Six countries provided information for non-CB systems reporting for any type of OD. The other systems reported either only ODs from a prescribed list, or specific diagnoses or diagnostic groups, with reports to most schemes being physician-based. Data collected varied but all systems collected diagnosis, age, gender, date reported and occupation (and/or industry) and most collected information on exposure.
Conclusions
This review provides information beneficial to both policy makers and researchers by identifying data sources useable to measure OD trends in European countries and opening the way to future work, both on trend comparisons within Europe and on the definition of a core template to extend OD surveillance on a larger scale
To improve occupational health public policies and to facilitate coordinated research within the European Union to reduce the incidence of occupational diseases (ODs), it is important to know what OD surveillance systems exist and how they compare. Monitoring trends in occupational diseases and tracing new and emerging risks in a network (Modernet) participants are well placed to provide this information as most either contribute data to and/or are involved in the management of OD systems.
Aims
To identify and describe OD surveillance systems in Modernet countries with the longer-term objective of identifying a core template to be used on a large scale.
Methods
A questionnaire sent to Modernet participants, seeking structured information about the OD surveillance system(s) in their country.
Results
Overall 14 countries (70%) provided information for 33 OD systems, among them 11 compensation-based (CB) systems. Six countries provided information for non-CB systems reporting for any type of OD. The other systems reported either only ODs from a prescribed list, or specific diagnoses or diagnostic groups, with reports to most schemes being physician-based. Data collected varied but all systems collected diagnosis, age, gender, date reported and occupation (and/or industry) and most collected information on exposure.
Conclusions
This review provides information beneficial to both policy makers and researchers by identifying data sources useable to measure OD trends in European countries and opening the way to future work, both on trend comparisons within Europe and on the definition of a core template to extend OD surveillance on a larger scale
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
A review of occupational disease surveillance.pdf
Size
404.16 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):5ed424ed10afbb0e810a7afad9e255dc