Faculty of Economics
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://repository.ukim.mk/handle/20.500.12188/9
Browse
251 results
Search Results
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Understanding Monetary Policy Communication in a Small and Open Economy Under an Exchange Rate Anchor: The Case of North Macedonia(Taylor and Francis (United Kingdom), 2024-01-19); - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, University Communication About Mental Health Amid the Twin Pandemics: Text Mining and Sentiment Analysis(College of Communication and Public Relations, 2025-07-25); - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Understanding social capital in community‐driven ride sharing: Lessons from a developing country(Wiley, 2024-08-15); ; Palamidovska Sterjadovska, Nikolina - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, University Communication About Mental Health Amid the Twin Pandemics: Text Mining and Sentiment Analysis(College of Communication and Public Relations, 2025-07-25); - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Unveiling the nexus between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and employee satisfaction: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis(Emerald Publishing, 2025-01-02); ; Purpose Researchers have tried analysing how the organizations’ practices of doing good can help improve their employees’ satisfaction over the past couple of decades. Employee satisfaction has a complicated relationship with a company’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities. Subsequently, the purpose of this paper is to conduct a bibliometric analysis and a literature review to trace the links between CSR and employee satisfaction, summarize and analyse the advances in this field, the knowledge gaps, publishing trends and further directions for future research. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a bibliometric analysis followed by a literature review of papers indexed in the Scopus database and published between 2000 and 2022. A total of 233 papers were identified, while 152 of them met the inclusion criteria for the analysis. Findings The subsequent analysis sheds light on the overlaps and connections between the two phenomena in human resource management (HRM). The authors outline potential avenues for future research and practical insight into how to leverage CSR activities for increasing work satisfaction. Originality/value By detailing the different ways CSR and employee satisfaction impact one another, analysing their relations and other supporting constructs, the authors contribute to the academic discourse by synthesizing prevailing literature and introducing practical guides for human resource (HR) professionals, managers and executives to manage turbulent surroundings more effectively, considering the major disruptions post-COVID-19 and the adoption of advanced technologies. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Analytical Modelling of Graduated Economists’ Employment(Springer International Publishing, 2022-11-12); ; ; - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Decoding Source Credibility: How it ifluences Trust in Informative Brand-Related Content and Customer Purchase Intentions(Faculty of Economics-Skopje, 2024-11); - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Quantifying FDI’s Effects on GDP and Unemployment: Evidence from North Macedonia(Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Economics-Skopje, 2025-12-20); ; - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Divided We Work: A Review on Political Polarization in Modern Business Organizations(Academy of Management, 2025-06-17); Research tackling political polarization in business organizations remains fragmented and relatively scarce. To understand the relevance of political polarization in businesses and manage the negative impact of political division on organizational operations, interpersonal relations, and organizational harmony, this investigation analyzed the literature surrounding the phenomenon of political polarization and its implications on business organizations, synthesized the findings in a framework, suggested strategies for mitigating this polarization in the work environment, and underscored pathways for future research using an integrative review approach. After a structured and rigorous thematic analysis of data from the databases Web of Science, Scopus, EBSCO, and JSTOR and adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, results point to a lack of coherent research streams and concise antecedents and outcomes, which are relevant for conflict management, as well as limited evidence on the effects of political division and limited study contexts. Future research may focus on specifying management-related research purposes, reexamining organizational constructs on individual, team, and unit levels, and extending investigations on performance-related themes - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Explorers or Exploiters: A Multi-Technique Bibliometric Review of Individual Ambidexterity(Academy of Management Proceedings, 2025-06-17); ; Global and dynamic environments have pressured organizations into becoming more ambidextrous, resulting in a paradox for contemporary organizational sciences (Papachroni & Heracleous, 2020; Zhang et al., 2022). While employees are seen as a key driver of competitive advantage and high organizational performance, their ambidexterity, i.e. individual ambidexterity has remained in the margins of the research landscape (Nasution et al., 2024; Parmigiani & Howard-Grenville, 2011). This single-perspective research lens neglects the diverse experiences and characteristics of each individual and the ways they can influence the balance between exploration and exploitation as organization members. Recently, researchers have answered the call with several studies analyzing the antecedents and outcomes of individual ambidexterity as well as this concept’s interplay with other organizational phenomena (Schnellbächer et al., 2019). Still, as a growing research niche, which is critical for understanding modern workplaces, there is a lack of a comprehensive, bibliometric synthesis of the findings and an analysis of the gaps. To address this, our research provides a comprehensive, multi-technique bibliometric review of individual ambidexterity research, identifying key trends and underexplored areas in the field. Individual ambidexterity in the organizational context is gaining momentum as a crucial component of innovative behavior and performance, individual well-being, as well as team ambidexterity, firm performance, and organizational sustainable outcomes (Mu et al., 2022; Akbar et al., 2024). Considering the context of rising flexible and remote work arrangements and the growing accessibility and use of artificial intelligence, there has never been a more important time to investigate the genesis and core of employee ambidexterity. This environment underpins the need for lifelong learning, flexibility, reskilling, and upskilling for individuals to stay relevant in their roles, which challenges how we view this type of ambidexterity (Balzano et al., 2024). Essentially, it is conceptualized as the individual ability to simultaneously explore and exploit organizational resources, or, in other words, to perform contradictory activities by switching mindsets and action sets (Rogan & Mors, 2014), presenting a paradox for managers and decision-makers. Thus, our study aims to contribute by integrating the knowledge about individual ambidexterity and pointing out hotspots, influential scientific voices, and areas for further investigation using a multi-technique bibliometric approach, grounded in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Stemming from this, central to this research investigation are the following research questions: 1) What is the inherent intellectual structure of the individual ambidexterity body of research? 2) What are the most impactful hotspots and themes in the research landscape? 3) What is the potential of individual ambidexterity research and what literature gaps on the topic exist?