Faculty of Medicine

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://repository.ukim.mk/handle/20.500.12188/14

Browse

Settings

Language: search.filters.language.EnglishSubject: search.filters.subject.thromboembolism

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    UNUSUAL PRESENTATION OF THROMBOEMBOLIC DISEASE IN A HOSPITALIZED PATIENT WITH A COVID-19 INFECTION: A CASE REPORT
    (Macedonian Association of Anatomists and Morphologists, 2021-12)
    ;
    ;
    Nedeska Minova, Natasha
    ;
    Terzievska, Keti
    With no ideal specific therapy confirmed by the science community, and many low income countries barely being able to obtain a sufficient number of vaccines, as well as the long-term mental health impact, the COVID-19 infection makes for a worldwide health and global problem. A COVID-19 positive patient was admitted due to poor condition, malaise and bilateral interstitial pneumonia with borderline oxygen saturation of 94%, hypoxemia with pO2 of 64mmHg, and elevated C reactive protein (CRP) of 70. The patient was put on oxygen support of 3l/min, and started parenteral antibiotic and LMWH in prophylactic doses - a combination that primarily improved the patient’s condition. Three days after hospitalization marked shortness of breath with a drop in oxygen saturation of 62% referred. With further increasing of the oxygen flow, and a transfer to ICU, gas pressures showed significant worsening and the patient was put on mechanical support with a CPAP mask. Despite adding pulsed doses of potent corticosteroid, rapid acting insulin for blood glucose control, and administerring convalescent plasma and parenteral nutrition, the CRP levels were increasing and oxygen was decreasing. Hypotensive, tachycardic and with reduced urine output, the patient was intubated and set up on IPPV mechanical support. Vasopressor stimulation didn’t improve the diuresis and elevation of degradation products followed, as well as elevation of the troponin and cardiospecific enzymes - non of which was caused by sepsis. Eight days after admission, the left arm presented as pale, cool and cyanotic. Fully deteriorated laboratory findings of multiple organ system failures (MOFS) were undoubtable; with the oxygen levels incompatible of life, and a CT scan with ARDS presentation, a continuous heparin infusion was the only solution. At the beginning, nothing indicated the deleterious outcome; however, with a highly unusual presentation of arterial thrombosis, the upper limb gangrene became too much and the patient died. COVID-19 is primary a respiratory infection, but the virus can affect other organs and systems, with some very rare presentations and deleterious outcomes.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    Vitamin K Antagonists After 6 Months of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in Cancer Patients with Venous Thromboembolism
    (Elsevier, 2018-04)
    Chai-Adisaksopha C
    ;
    Iorio A
    ;
    Crowther MA
    ;
    de Miguel J
    ;
    Salgado E
    Background: Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is the treatment of choice in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism. However, data on continuing LMWH treatment beyond 6 months remain scanty. Methods: We used the RIETE (Registro Informatizado Enfermedad TromboEmbólica) registry to compare the rate of venous thromboembolism recurrences and major bleeding appearing beyond the first 6 months of anticoagulant therapy in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism, according to therapy with LMWH or vitamin K antagonists (VKA). We performed a propensity score-matched cohort study. Results: After propensity matching, 482 cancer patients continued to receive LMWH and 482 switched to VKA. During the course of anticoagulant therapy (mean 275.5 days), 57 patients developed venous thrombosis recurrences (recurrent pulmonary embolism 26, recurrent deep vein thrombosis 29, both 2), 28 had major bleeding, 38 had nonmajor bleeding, and 129 died. No patient died of recurrent venous thrombosis, and 5 patients died of bleeding (2 were on LMWH, 3 on VKA). Patients who continued with LMWH had a similar rate of deep vein thrombosis recurrences (relative risk [RR] 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-2.93), pulmonary embolism recurrences (RR 0.73; 95% CI, 0.34-1.58), major bleeding (RR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.51-1.79), or nonmajor bleeding (RR 1.15; 95% CI, 0.55-2.40), compared with those who switched to VKA, but a higher mortality rate (RR 1.58; 95% CI, 1.13-2.20). Conclusions: In cancer patients with venous thromboembolism who completed 6 months of LMWH therapy, switching to VKA was associated with a similar risk of venous thrombosis recurrences or bleeding when compared with patients who continued LMWH.