Faculty of Medicine
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://repository.ukim.mk/handle/20.500.12188/14
Browse
11 results
Search Results
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, CARDIOVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS IN KOVID-19(MIT University Skopje, 2022-03) ;Petrushevska, Ane; The 2019 coronavirus disease (KOVID-19) caused by the new coronavirus (SARS-KOV2), a severe acute respiratory syndrome, quickly developed into a global pandemic. It has caused significant mortality worldwide and is primarily associated with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In addition to ARDS clinical reports have shown significant cardiovascular complications in patients with KOVID-19. Virus infection, cytokine stimulation, altered immune response, and myocardial damage are some of the mechanisms for KOVID-19 cardiovascular complications. The aim of this paper is to present the previously published medical evidence from studies and research in the world related to cardiovascular complications in conditions of infection with KOVID-19. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Comparative features and outcomes of major neurological complications of COVID-19(Wiley-Blackwell, 2022-10) ;Beghi E ;Moro E ;Davidescu EI ;Popescu BOGrosu OBackground and purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the neurological complications of SARS- CoV- 2 infection and compare phenotypes and outcomes in infected patients with and without selected neurological manifestations. Methods: The data source was a registry established by the European Academy of Neurology during the first wave of the COVID- 19 pandemic. Neurologists collected data on patients with COVID- 19 seen as in- and outpatients and in emergency rooms in 23 European and seven non- European countries. Prospective and retrospective data included patient demographics, lifestyle habits, comorbidities, main COVID- 19 complications, hospital and intensive care unit admissions, diagnostic tests, and outcome. Acute/ subacute selected neurological manifestations in patients with COVID- 19 were analysed, comparing individuals with and without each condition for several risk factors. Results: By July 31, 2021, 1523 patients (758 men, 756 women, and nine intersex/unknown, aged 16– 101 years) were registered. Neurological manifestations were diagnosed in 1213 infected patients (79.6%). At study entry, 978 patients (64.2%) had one or more chronic general or neurological comorbidities. Predominant acute/subacute neurological manifestations were cognitive dysfunction (N = 449, 29.5%), stroke (N = 392, 25.7%), sleep– wake disturbances (N = 250, 16.4%), dysautonomia (N = 224, 14.7%), peripheral neuropathy (N = 145, 9.5%), movement disorders (N = 142, 9.3%), ataxia (N = 134, 8.8%), and seizures (N = 126, 8.3%). These manifestations tended to differ with regard to age, general and neurological comorbidities, infection severity and non- neurological manifestations, extent of association with other acute/subacute neurological manifestations, and outcome. Conclusions: Patients with COVID- 19 and neurological manifestations present with distinct phenotypes. Differences in age, general and neurological comorbidities, and infection severity characterize the various neurological manifestations of COVID-19. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Maternal and perinatal outcomes in women with advanced maternal age affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection (Phase-2): The WAPM (World Association of Perinatal Medicine) Working Group on COVID-19(Cetus Publishing, 2021-03-09) ;D'Antonio, Francesco ;Şen, Cihat ;Di Mascio, Daniel ;Galindo, AlbertoVillalain, CeciliaObjective To elucidate the role of advanced maternal age (AMA) in determining the outcome of pregnancies complicated by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods Multinational cohort study included women with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection from 76 centers in 27 different countries in Europe, United States, South America, Asia and Australia from 04 April 2020 till 28 October 2020. The primary outcome was a composite measure of maternal mortality and morbidity including admission to intensive care unit (ICU), use of mechanical ventilation (defined as intubation, need for continuous positive airway pressure, extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation), severe respiratory symptoms (including dyspnea and shortness of breath) or death. Results Eight hundred and eighty seven pregnant women were included in the study who were positive SARS-CoV-2 results by RT-PCR (reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction) on their nasal and pharyngeal swab specimens (352 with and 652 with no AMA). The risk of composite adverse maternal outcome was higher in AMA group compared to that of under 35 years of age group, with an OR of 1.99 (95% CI 1.4–2.9; p=0.002). Likewise, women >35 years were also at higher risk of hospital admission (OR: 1.88, 95% CI 1.4–2.5; p<0.001), presence of severe respiratory symptoms (OR: 1.53, 95% CI 1.0–2.3; p=0.04) and/or admission to ICU (OR: 2.00, 95% CI 1.1–3.7; p=0.003); however, no difference was observed in terms of perinatal outcome risk. Conclusion Advanced maternal age is an independent risk factor for adverse maternal outcome in pregnancies complicated by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Accurate risk stratification of women presenting with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy is warranted in order to identify a subset of women who may benefit from a personalized management, including elective hospitalization and/or prolonged surveillance in order to improve maternal outcome. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Maternal and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection(Wiley, 2021-02) ;The WAPM (World Association of Perinatal Medicine) Working Group on COVID-19To evaluate the maternal and perinatal outcomes of pregnancies affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Risk factors associated with adverse fetal outcomes in pregnancies affected by Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a secondary analysis of the WAPM study on COVID-19(Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2020-11-26) ;Di Mascio, Daniele ;Sen, Cihat ;Saccone, Gabriele ;Galindo, AlbertoGrünebaum, AmosObjectives To evaluate the strength of association between maternal and pregnancy characteristics and the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies with laboratory confirmed COVID-19. Methods Secondary analysis of a multinational, cohort study on all consecutive pregnant women with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from February 1, 2020 to April 30, 2020 from 73 centers from 22 different countries. A confirmed case of COVID-19 was defined as a positive result on real-time reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) assay of nasal and pharyngeal swab specimens. The primary outcome was a composite adverse fetal outcome, defined as the presence of either abortion (pregnancy loss before 22 weeks of gestations), stillbirth (intrauterine fetal death after 22 weeks of gestation), neonatal death (death of a live-born infant within the first 28 days of life), and perinatal death (either stillbirth or neonatal death). Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate parameters independently associated with the primary outcome. Logistic regression was reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Mean gestational age at diagnosis was 30.6±9.5 weeks, with 8.0% of women being diagnosed in the first, 22.2% in the second and 69.8% in the third trimester of pregnancy. There were six miscarriage (2.3%), six intrauterine device (IUD) (2.3) and 5 (2.0%) neonatal deaths, with an overall rate of perinatal death of 4.2% (11/265), thus resulting into 17 cases experiencing and 226 not experiencing composite adverse fetal outcome. Neither stillbirths nor neonatal deaths had congenital anomalies found at antenatal or postnatal evaluation. Furthermore, none of the cases experiencing IUD had signs of impending demise at arterial or venous Doppler. Neonatal deaths were all considered as prematurity-related adverse events. Of the 250 live-born neonates, one (0.4%) was found positive at RT-PCR pharyngeal swabs performed after delivery. The mother was tested positive during the third trimester of pregnancy. The newborn was asymptomatic and had negative RT-PCR test after 14 days of life. At logistic regression analysis, gestational age at diagnosis (OR: 0.85, 95% CI 0.8-0.9 per week increase; p<0.001), birthweight (OR: 1.17, 95% CI 1.09-1.12.7 per 100 g decrease; p=0.012) and maternal ventilatory support, including either need for oxygen or CPAP (OR: 4.12, 95% CI 2.3-7.9; p=0.001) were independently associated with composite adverse fetal outcome. Conclusions Early gestational age at infection, maternal ventilatory supports and low birthweight are the main determinants of adverse perinatal outcomes in fetuses with maternal COVID-19 infection. Conversely, the risk of vertical transmission seems negligible. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Maternal and perinatal outcomes in high compared to low risk pregnancies complicated by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection (phase 2): the World Association of Perinatal Medicine working group on coronavirus disease 2019(Elsevier BV, 2021-07) ;D'Antonio, Francesco ;Sen, Cihat ;Mascio, Daniele Di ;Galindo, AlbertoVillalain, CeciliaIt has still to be ascertained whether severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in pregnancy is associated with worse maternal and fetal outcomes compared to low risk gestations. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate maternal and perinatal outcomes in high- and low-risk pregnancies complicated by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. STUDY DESIGN This was a multinational retrospective cohort study involving women with laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection from 76 centers from 25 countries in Europe, the United States, South America, Asia, and Australia from April 4, 2020, to October 28, 2020. The primary outcome was a composite measure of maternal mortality and morbidity, including admission to the intensive care unit, use of mechanical ventilation, or death. The secondary outcome was a composite measure of adverse perinatal outcome, including miscarriage, fetal loss, neonatal and perinatal death, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. All outcomes were assessed in high- and low-risk pregnancies. Pregnancies were considered high risk in case of either preexisting chronic medical conditions in pregnancy or obstetrical disorders occurring in pregnancy. The Fisher exact test and logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the data. RESULTS A total of 887 singleton pregnancies who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction of nasal and pharyngeal swab specimens were included in the study. The risk of composite adverse maternal outcomes was higher in high-risk pregnancies than in low-risk pregnancies (odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.03–2.24; P=.035). In addition, women carrying high-risk pregnancies were at higher risk of hospital admission (odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.07–2.04; P=.002), presence of severe respiratory symptoms (odds ratio, 2.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.41–3.21; P=.001), admission to the intensive care unit (odds ratio, 2.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.42–4.88), and invasive mechanical ventilation (odds ratio, 2.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.19–5.94; P=.002). When exploring perinatal outcomes, high-risk pregnancies were at high risk of adverse perinatal outcomes (odds ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.15–2.72; P=.009). However, such association was mainly because of the higher incidence of miscarriage in high-risk pregnancies compared with that in low-risk pregnancies (5.3% vs 1.6%, P=.008); furthermore, there was no difference in other explored outcomes between the 2 study groups. At logistic regression analysis, maternal age (odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–1.22; P=.023) and high-risk pregnancy (odds ratio, 4.21; 95% confidence interval, 3.90–5.11; P<.001) were independently associated with adverse maternal outcomes. CONCLUSION High-risk pregnancies complicated by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection were at higher risk of adverse maternal outcomes than low-risk pregnancies complicated by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Cardiovascular Testing in Asia: The IAEA INCAPS-COVID Study(Elsevier BV, 2021-09) ;Kudo, Takashi ;Lahey, Ryan ;Hirschfeld, Cole B ;Williams, Michelle CLu, BinBackground: The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic significantly affected the management of cardiovascular disease around the world. The effect of the pandemic on the volume of cardiovascular diagnostic procedures is not known. Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the effects of the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiovascular diagnostic procedures and safety practices in Asia. Methods: The International Atomic Energy Agency conducted a worldwide survey to assess changes in cardiovascular procedure volume and safety practices caused by COVID-19. Testing volumes were reported for March 2020 and April 2020 and were compared to those from March 2019. Data from 180 centers across 33 Asian countries were grouped into 4 subregions for comparison. Results: Procedure volumes decreased by 47% from March 2019 to March 2020, showing recovery from March 2020 to April 2020 in Eastern Asia, particularly in China. The majority of centers canceled outpatient activities and increased time per study. Practice changes included implementing physical distancing and restricting visitors. Although COVID testing was not commonly performed, it was conducted in one-third of facilities in Eastern Asia. The most severe reductions in procedure volumes were observed in lower-income countries, where volumes decreased by 81% from March 2019 to April 2020. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic in Asia caused significant reductions in cardiovascular diagnostic procedures, particularly in low-income countries. Further studies on the effects of COVID-19 on cardiovascular outcomes and changes in care delivery are warranted. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Worldwide Disparities in Recovery of Cardiac Testing 1 Year Into COVID-19(ELSEVIER, 2022-05-24) ;Einstein, Andrew J ;Hirschfeld, Cole ;Williams, Michelle C ;Vitola, Joao VBetter, NathanBackground: The extent to which health care systems have adapted to the COVID-19 pandemic to provide necessary cardiac diagnostic services is unknown. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the pandemic on cardiac testing practices, volumes and types of diagnostic services, and perceived psychological stress to health care providers worldwide. Methods: The International Atomic Energy Agency conducted a worldwide survey assessing alterations from baseline in cardiovascular diagnostic care at the pandemic's onset and 1 year later. Multivariable regression was used to determine factors associated with procedure volume recovery. Results: Surveys were submitted from 669 centers in 107 countries. Worldwide reduction in cardiac procedure volumes of 64% from March 2019 to April 2020 recovered by April 2021 in high- and upper middle-income countries (recovery rates of 108% and 99%) but remained depressed in lower middle- and low-income countries (46% and 30% recovery). Although stress testing was used 12% less frequently in 2021 than in 2019, coronary computed tomographic angiography was used 14% more, a trend also seen for other advanced cardiac imaging modalities (positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance; 22%-25% increases). Pandemic-related psychological stress was estimated to have affected nearly 40% of staff, impacting patient care at 78% of sites. In multivariable regression, only lower-income status and physicians' psychological stress were significant in predicting recovery of cardiac testing. Conclusions: Cardiac diagnostic testing has yet to recover to prepandemic levels in lower-income countries. Worldwide, the decrease in standard stress testing is offset by greater use of advanced cardiac imaging modalities. Pandemic-related psychological stress among providers is widespread and associated with poor recovery of cardiac testing. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, International Impact of COVID-19 on the Diagnosis of Heart Disease(ELSEVER, 2021-01-19) ;Einstein, Andrew J ;Shaw, Leslee J ;Hirschfeld, Cole ;Williams, Michelle CVillines, Todd CThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has adversely affected diagnosis and treatment of noncommunicable diseases. Its effects on delivery of diagnostic care for cardiovascular disease, which remains the leading cause of death worldwide, have not been quantified. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Cardiovascular Testing in Asia(Elsevier BV, 2021-09) ;Kudo, Takashi ;Lahey, Ryan ;Hirschfeld, Cole B. ;Williams, Michelle C.Lu, BinAbstract: Background The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic significantly affected management of cardiovascular disease around the world. The effect of the pandemic on volume of cardiovascular diagnostic procedures is not known. Objectives This study sought to evaluate the effects of the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiovascular diagnostic procedures and safety practices in Asia. Methods The International Atomic Energy Agency conducted a worldwide survey to assess changes in cardiovascular procedure volume and safety practices caused by COVID-19. Testing volumes were reported for March 2020 and April 2020 and were compared to those from March 2019. Data from 180 centers across 33 Asian countries were grouped into 4 subregions for comparison. Results Procedure volumes decreased by 47% from March 2019 to March 2020, showing recovery from March 2020 to April 2020 in Eastern Asia, particularly in China. The majority of centers cancelled outpatient activities and increased time per study. Practice changes included implementing physical distancing and restricting visitors. Although COVID testing was not commonly performed, it was conducted in one-third of facilities in Eastern Asia. The most severe reductions in procedure volumes were observed in lower-income countries, where volumes decreased 81% from March 2019 to April 2020. Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic in Asia caused significant reductions in cardiovascular diagnostic procedures, particularly in low-income countries. Further studies on effects of COVID-19 on cardiovascular outcomes and changes in care delivery are warranted.
