Faculty of Medicine

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://repository.ukim.mk/handle/20.500.12188/14

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5

Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Predictors of active cancer thromboembolic outcomes. RIETE experience of the Khorana score in cancer-associated thrombosis.
(Thieme, 2017)
Tafur AJ,
;
Caprini JA,
;
Cote L
;
Trujillo-Santos J
;
Del Toro J,
Even though the Khorana risk score (KRS) has been validated to predict against the development of VTE among patients with cancer, it has a low positive predictive value. It is also unknown whether the score predicts outcomes in patients with cancer with established VTE. We selected a cohort of patients with active cancer from the RIETE (Registro Informatizado Enfermedad TromboEmbolica) registry to assess the prognostic value of the KRS at inception in predicting the likelihood of VTE recurrences, major bleeding and mortality during the course of anticoagulant therapy. We analysed 7948 consecutive patients with cancer-associated VTE. Of these, 2253 (28 %) scored 0 points, 4550 (57 %) 1-2 points and 1145 (14 %) scored ≥3 points. During the course of anticoagulation, amongst patient with low, moderate and high risk KRS, the rate of VTE recurrences was of 6.21 (95 %CI: 4.99-7.63), 11.2 (95 %CI: 9.91-12.7) and 19.4 (95 %CI: 15.4-24.1) events per 100 patient-years; the rate of major bleeding of 5.24 (95 %CI: 4.13-6.56), 10.3 (95 %CI: 9.02-11.7) and 19.4 (95 %CI: 15.4-24.1) bleeds per 100 patient-years and the mortality rate of 25.3 (95 %CI: 22.8-28.0), 58.5 (95 %CI: 55.5-61.7) and 120 (95 %CI: 110-131) deaths per 100 patient-years, respectively. The C-statistic was 0.53 (0.50-0.56) for recurrent VTE, 0.56 (95 %CI: 0.54-0.59) for major bleeding and 0.54 (95 %CI: 0.52-0.56) for death. In conclusion, most VTEs occur in patients with low or moderate risk scores. The KRS did not accurately predict VTE recurrence, major bleeding, or mortality among patients with cancer-associated thrombosis.
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Once versus twice daily enoxaparin for the initial treatment of acute venous thromboembolism
(Thieme Medical Publishers, 2017)
Trujillo-Santos J
;
Bergmann JF
;
Bortoluzzi C
;
López-Reyes R
;
Giorgi-Pierfranceschi M
Essentials In venous thromboembolism (VTE), it is uncertain if enoxaparin should be given twice or once daily. We compared the 15- and 30-day outcomes in VTE patients on enoxaparin twice vs. once daily. Patients on enoxaparin once daily had fewer major bleeds and deaths than those on twice daily. The rate of VTE recurrences was similar in both subgroups. Summary: Background In patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), it is uncertain whether enoxaparin should be administered twice or once daily. Methods We used the RIETE Registry data to compare the 15- and 30-day rates of VTE recurrence, major bleeding and death between patients receiving enoxaparin twice daily and those receiving it once daily. We used propensity score matching to adjust for confounding variables. Results The study included 4730 patients: 3786 (80%) received enoxaparin twice daily and 944 once daily. During the first 15 days, patients on enoxaparin once daily had a trend towards more VTE recurrences (odds ratio [OR], 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-5.88), fewer major bleeds (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.17-1.08) and fewer deaths (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.13-0.78) than those on enoxaparin twice daily. At day 30, patients on enoxaparin once daily had more VTE recurrences (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.03-5.88), fewer major bleeds (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.17-0.94) and fewer deaths (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.33-1.00). On propensity analysis, patients on enoxaparin once daily had fewer major bleeds at 15 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.30; 95% CI, 0.10-0.88) and at 30 days (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.68) and also fewer deaths at 15 (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.14-0.99) and at 30 days (HR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.07-0.54) than those on enoxaparin twice daily. Conclusions Our findings confirm that enoxaparin prescribed once daily results in fewer major bleeds than enoxaparin twice daily, as suggested in a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Real-life treatment of venous thromboembolism with direct oral anticoagulants: The influence of recommended dosing and regimens
(Thieme Medical Publishers, 2017)
Trujillo-Santos J
;
Di Micco P
;
Dentali F
;
Douketis J
;
Díaz-Peromingo JA
In patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), the influence on outcome of using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) at non-recommended doses or regimens (once vs twice daily) has not been investigated yet. We used the RIETE (Registro Informatizado Enfermedad TromboEmbólica) registry to compare the outcomes in patients with VTE receiving DOACs according to the recommendations of the product label versus in those receiving non-recommended doses and/or regimens. The major outcomes were the rate of VTE recurrences, major bleeding and death during the course of therapy. As of March 2016, 1635 VTE patients had received DOACs for initial therapy and 1725 for long-term therapy. For initial therapy, 287 of 1591 patients (18 %) on rivaroxaban and 22 of 44 (50 %) on apixaban did not receive the recommended therapy. For long-term therapy, 217 of 1611 patients (14 %) on rivaroxaban, 29 of 81 (36 %) on apixaban and 15 of 33 (46 %) on dabigatran did not receive the recommended therapy. During the course of therapy with DOACs, eight patients developed VTE recurrences, 14 had major bleeding and 13 died. Patients receiving DOACs at non-recommended doses and/or regimens experienced a higher rate of VTE recurrences (adjusted HR: 10.5; 95 %CI: 1.28-85.9) and a similar rate of major bleeding (adjusted HR: 1.04; 95 %CI: 0.36-3.03) or death (adjusted HR: 1.41; 95 %CI: 0.46-4.29) than those receiving the recommended doses and regimens. In our cohort, a non-negligible proportion of VTE patients received non-recommended doses and/or regimens of DOACs. This use may be associated with worse outcomes.
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
The Clinical Course of Venous Thromboembolism May Differ According to Cancer Site.
(Elsevier, 2016)
Mahé I
;
Chidiac J
;
Bertoletti L
;
Font C
;
Trujillo-Santos J
Background: We hypothesized that the clinical course of venous thromboembolism in patients with active cancer may differ according to the specificities of primary tumor site. Aim and methods: We used data from RIETE (international registry of patients with venous thromboembolism) to compare the clinical venous thromboembolism-related outcomes during the course of anticoagulation in patients with one of the 4 more frequent cancers (breast, prostate, colorectal, or lung cancer). Results: As of September 2014, 3947 cancer patients were recruited, of whom 938 had breast, 629 prostate, 1189 colorectal, and 1191 lung cancer. Overall, 55% had metastatic disease (42%, 36%, 53%, and 72%, respectively). During the course of anticoagulant therapy (mean duration, 139 days), the rate of thromboembolic recurrences was similar to the rate of major bleeding in patients with breast (5.6 [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.8-8.1] vs 4.1 [95% CI, 2.7-5.9] events per 100 patient-years) or colorectal cancer (10 [95% CI, 7.6-13] vs 12 [95% CI, 9.4-15] per 100 patient-years). In contrast, in patients with prostate cancer, the rate of venous thromboembolic recurrences was half the rate of major bleeding (6.9 [95% CI, 4.4-10] vs 13 [95% CI, 9.2-17] events per 100 patient-years), whereas in those with lung cancer, the rate of thromboembolic recurrences was twofold higher than the rate of major bleeding (27 [95% CI, 22-23] vs 11 [95% CI, 8.6-15] per 100 patient-years). Conclusions: Significant differences in the clinical profile of venous thromboembolic-related outcomes were observed according to the site of cancer. These findings suggest the development of cancer-specific anticoagulant strategies as an area for further research.
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Fondaparinux in the initial and long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism
(Elsevier, 2015)
Pesavento R
;
Amitrano M
;
Trujillo-Santos J
;
Di Micco P
;
Mangiacapra S
Background: Even in the absence of evidence on its long-term efficacy and safety, a number of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) receive long-term therapy with fondaparinux alone in everyday practice. Methods: We used the Registro Informatizado de Enfermedad Tromboembólica (RIETE) registry to compare the rate of VTE recurrences and major bleeding at 10 and 90 days in patients with and without cancer. For long-term therapy, fondaparinux was compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in patients without cancer and with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in those with cancer. Results: Of 47,378 patients recruited, 46,513 were initially treated with heparin, 865 with fondaparinux. Then, 263 patients (78 with cancer) were treated for at least 3 months with fondaparinux. After propensity-score matching, there were no differences between patients receiving initial therapy with heparin or fondaparinux. Among patients with cancer, there were no differences between fondaparinux and LMWH. Among patients without cancer, the long-term use of fondaparinux was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (3.24 % vs. 0.95 %, p<0.05). Conclusions: An unexpected high rate of major bleeding was observed in non-cancer patients treated with long-term fondaparinux. Our small sample does not allow to derive relevant conclusions on the use of fondaparinux in cancer patients.

Faculty of Medicine

Browse

Filters

Settings

Sort By

Results per page

Search Results