Faculty of Medicine

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://repository.ukim.mk/handle/20.500.12188/14

Browse

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Kostova, MashaSubject: search.filters.subject.radiculopathy

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    Clinical Effectiveness of Single Lumbar Periradicular Infiltration in Patients with Sciatica
    (Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts/Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2023-07-15)
    ;
    Kostova, Masha
    ;
    ;
    Ristikj-Stomnaroska, Daniela
    ;
    Periradicular therapy (PRT) is a minimally invasive radiological procedurein patients with chronic lumbar pain.The aim of the study is to identify clinical and radiological predictive factors for treatment success after a single PRT treatment in patients with sciatica.The study includes a prospective follow-up of 166 patients treated with PRT. The pain intensity is determined according to the VAS scale and the degree of improvement is presented as excellent (over 75%), good (50-70%), moderate (25-49%), and weak (less than 25%). The follow up of the treated patients was done at 2 weeks, 3 and 6 months. In patients with pain duration up to 3 months, the improvement was excellent in n=32 (58.18%) after 2 weeks, after 3 months n=41 (74.55%) and after 6 months n=41 (74.55%). This stands in contrast to patients with pain over 1 year. The percentage of improvement after 6 months, post-intervention, was highest in patients without nerve root compression (86.25±19.2),and the highest improvement after 6 months was in patients with localization of pain at the L4-L5 level (69.69±29.7), the greatest improvement after six months was in patients with extraforaminal hernia (62.82±34.3), and the lowest in patients with central stenosis (40.21±30.7).Our study results suggest that the shorter a pain duration, low-grade root compression, injection level and type of herniation area predictor the more favourable response patients have to transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with sciatica.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH IN PATIENT WITH EXTRAFORAMINAL DISC HERNIATION
    (Македонско лекарско друштво = Macedonian medical association, 2023-04-07)
    ;
    Kostova, Masha
    ;
    Jovanoska, Ivona
    ;
    Nancheva, Andrea
    ;
    Dungevski, Gjorgi
    Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate the history, treatment and clinical outcome of a patient with low back pain and radiculopathy caused by extraforaminar disck herniation, after a minimally invasive procedure (PRT) periradicular therapy and physical therapy in order for educational purposes. Clinical features: A 48-year-old patient without comorbidities was presented with 3-week history of lumbar pain with irradiation to the left lower extremity. The patient had difficulty sitting and standing with antalgic movement without being able to assume an upright position.. The pain was intensified by lateral movements dominant left and positioning backwards with propagation to the left side and hip. Dominant symptom was radicular pain with paresis and hypesthesia of the affected dermatoma of lower limb. The diagnosis was confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging with showed exoforaminar disc herniation on the level L4-L5. Intervention and outcome: Advantages of PRT are: minimal invasive procedure, CT guided intervention for exact and precise delivery of the medications, low risk in damage of important local anatomical structures, short recovery time, easy approach and low cost for patient and for the medical institution, respectively. In our study, CT Siemens 16 slice was used for the intervention. The patient was treated with lumbar epidural corticosteroid application and physical therapy. Physical therapy included self-traction and strengthening exercises. Functional status was measured using a Modified Oswestry Questionnaire and numerical pain assessment scale VAS scale. Initially, before intervention, functional status was assessed at 68%, with pain 8/10. After treatment, functional status was 4% and pain was assessed as 1/10. Conclusion: Multidisciplinary approach is needed in patients with extraforaminal disc herniation for better results. In our case study, PRT demonstrated a significant role in treating our patient. As a result of the treatment significant reduction of pain and improvement of functional status was observed. The patient returned to normal life habits and activities in a very short time, which was primary goal.