Faculty of Medicine

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://repository.ukim.mk/handle/20.500.12188/14

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    COVID-19 and acute heart failure among patients with cancer
    (Oxford University Press (OUP), 2022-10-01)
    Bergami, M
    ;
    Fabin, N
    ;
    Mjehovic, P
    ;
    Pasalic, M
    ;
    Scarpone, M
    Background: Patients with cancer represent a uniquely vulnerable population not only with higher susceptibility to COVID-19 but also at increased risk for death. However, detailed information on causes of death and the contribution of pre-existing health conditions to death yet is missing. Purpose: This study focuses on the implications of COVID-19 in the cardiovascular health of patients with cancer by assessing the relation between cancer and de novo acute heart failure (AHF) with in-hospital mortality. Methods: The initial population consisted of 3968 patients included in the ISACS COVID-19 registry between March 2020 and February 2022. Of these, 546 patients with chronic HF were excluded, leaving a final population of 3422. Patients were divided in two groups according to the presence or absence of a cancer diagnosis at the time of hospitalization for COVID- 19. Primary outcomes were incidence of in-hospital mortality or AHF during hospitalization. Association between cancer and outcomes was estimated using multivariable logistic regression analyses. Subsidiary analysis was conducted to evaluate differences between patients with prior vs active cancer. Results: Of the 3422 patients included in the study, 468 patients had cancer (8.2% active, 5.5% past cancer). Cancer patients were older (68.9±13.4 vs 63.3±15.6, p-value <0.001) and more likely to be female (50.4% vs 39.1%, p-value <0.001). They presented more frequently with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (12.3% vs 7.6%, p-value = 0.001). When considering outcomes, cancer patients had a significantly higher incidence of in-hospital mortality (27.7% vs 19.2%; p-value <0.001). This despite the presence of a numerically higher mean PiO2/FiO2 (281±108.8 vs 267.05±122.5, p-value = 0.11) on admission and a lower rate of X-ray findings of interstitial pneumonia (60% vs 70.5%, p-value <0.001) than their non-oncological counterparts, as well as similar use of mechanical ventilation (30.6% vs 35.0%, p value=0.14). The association between cancer and death persisted when adjusting for demographic, laboratory findings and in-hospital treatment (OR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.11–1.94; p value=0.01). Cancer patients also had higher rates of AHF (9.6% vs 4.7%, p-value <0.001) during hospitalization. This association was independent from presence of cardiovascular risk factors or comorbidities (OR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.07–2.43; p value=0.02). When restricting the analysis to the cancer population, AHF appeared to be significantly associated with death (OR: 2.41; 95% CI 1.18– 4.95; p-value = 0.01), but this correlation persisted only in patients affected by active cancer in age and sex adjusted analyses (OR: 4.27; 95% CI: 1.51–12.07; p value=0.01 vs 1.20; 95% CI: 0.38–3.76; p-value = 0.75). Conclusions: The incidence of AHF in cancer patients with COVID-19 is high. Patients with active cancer are also at high risk for mortality. This has implications for cardiac monitoring and chemotherapy administration during COVID-19.
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Prognostic value of brain natriuretic peptide in COVID-19 with or without acute heart failure
    (Oxford University Press (OUP), 2022-10-01)
    Bergami, M
    ;
    Manfrini, O
    ;
    Cenko, E
    ;
    Dorobantu, M
    ;
    Background: Although Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) provides strong prognostic information of an unfavorable outcome in patients with acute heart failure (AHF), there is little information of its relevance as a biomarker for outcomes in COVID-19 and its complications Purpose: To evaluate the association of increased BNP levels with complications and in-hospital mortality in a cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Methods: The study included COVID-19 patients with data on BNP levels included in the ISACS COVID-19 registry. The population was categorized according to the presence of peak BNP levels ≥100 pg/mL during hospitalization. Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, AHF or acute respiratory failure (ARF, defined as PiO2/FiO2<300 mmHg or need for mechanical ventilation). Calculations were conducted using age and sex-adjusted multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results were also stratified according to presence or absence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) history. Differences between subgroups were verified for statistical significance using test for interaction. Results: Of the 1152 patients included in the study, 615 (53.4%) had elevated BNP levels. These subjects were older (69.9±13.8 vs 59.1±16.8, p-value<0.001), had higher rates of cardiovascular risk factors (82.9% vs 57.7%, p-value<0.001) and presented more frequently with a prior history of CVD (either ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, venous thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation or a history of revascularization) (50.1% vs 27.5%, p-value<0.001). No sex differences were observed. When considering outcomes, BNP levels ≥100 pg/mL were associated with increased rates of in-hospital mortality (32.9% vs 4.9%, p-value<0.001), even after adjustment for demographic characteristics (OR: 7.35; 95% CI: 4.75–11.40; p-value<0.001). High BNP levels were also strongly associated with an increased risk of AHF (OR 19.9; 95% CI 8.6–45.9; pvalue< 0.001), a correlation that persisted both in patients with and without a prior CVD history (p for interaction=0.29). Of note, patients with elevated BNP also had a higher likelihood of developing ARF (OR 2.7; 95% CI 2.1– 3.6; p-value<0.001), even in absence of AHF (OR 3.00; 95% CI 2.20–4.1; p-value<0.001). Conclusions: In COVID-19, blood BNP level not only appears to be a predictor of in-hospital mortality and AHF but was also independently associated with an increased risk of ARF. This finding supports the routine use of BNP in all patients admitted to the hospital for COVID-19, regardless of a prior history of CVD.