Faculty of Medicine

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://repository.ukim.mk/handle/20.500.12188/14

Browse

Settings

Access type: UnknownSubject: search.filters.subject.natriuretic peptide

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    Incremental Value of Cardiac Biomarkers in Mid-term Prognosis of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome
    (Scientific Foundation SPIROSKI, 2022-02-14)
    Serafimov, A
    ;
    Donevski, D
    ;
    Karakolevska Ilova, M
    ;
    Joveva, E
    ;
    Todosieva Serafimova, K
    Background: Given the number of prognostic studies, both short- and long-termed, in patients with myocardial infarction (MI), the data on predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE) following discharge still remains limited. Aim: to identify early predictors of MACE in MI patients, that underwent Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (pPCI), with special emphasis on multiple cardiac biomarkers. Materials and methods: we analysed clinical, LV functional, angiographic variables, as well cardiac troponin, a marker of myocardial necrosis, natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), a marker of myocardial stress, and white blood cells (WBC), as a marker of inflammation. The study population were 150 consecutive patients treated for acute myocardial infarction. Results: The average follow-up period was 31 months. In total, 26 patients suffered from at least one MACE. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified several independent predictors: NT-proBNP (p=0,07), number of diseased vessels (p=0,027), and need for loop diuretic therapy (p=0,050). ROC curve demonstrated excellent discriminatory function for MACE of NT-proBNP and WBC (area under the curve .640, and .658, p=0.025 and 0.011 respectively). Conclusion: The combination of biomarkers for myocardial stress and inflammation improves the prediction of major adverse cardiac events in MI survivors.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    Prognostic value of brain natriuretic peptide in COVID-19 with or without acute heart failure
    (Oxford University Press (OUP), 2022-10-01)
    Bergami, M
    ;
    Manfrini, O
    ;
    Cenko, E
    ;
    Dorobantu, M
    ;
    Background: Although Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) provides strong prognostic information of an unfavorable outcome in patients with acute heart failure (AHF), there is little information of its relevance as a biomarker for outcomes in COVID-19 and its complications Purpose: To evaluate the association of increased BNP levels with complications and in-hospital mortality in a cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Methods: The study included COVID-19 patients with data on BNP levels included in the ISACS COVID-19 registry. The population was categorized according to the presence of peak BNP levels ≥100 pg/mL during hospitalization. Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, AHF or acute respiratory failure (ARF, defined as PiO2/FiO2<300 mmHg or need for mechanical ventilation). Calculations were conducted using age and sex-adjusted multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results were also stratified according to presence or absence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) history. Differences between subgroups were verified for statistical significance using test for interaction. Results: Of the 1152 patients included in the study, 615 (53.4%) had elevated BNP levels. These subjects were older (69.9±13.8 vs 59.1±16.8, p-value<0.001), had higher rates of cardiovascular risk factors (82.9% vs 57.7%, p-value<0.001) and presented more frequently with a prior history of CVD (either ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, venous thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation or a history of revascularization) (50.1% vs 27.5%, p-value<0.001). No sex differences were observed. When considering outcomes, BNP levels ≥100 pg/mL were associated with increased rates of in-hospital mortality (32.9% vs 4.9%, p-value<0.001), even after adjustment for demographic characteristics (OR: 7.35; 95% CI: 4.75–11.40; p-value<0.001). High BNP levels were also strongly associated with an increased risk of AHF (OR 19.9; 95% CI 8.6–45.9; pvalue< 0.001), a correlation that persisted both in patients with and without a prior CVD history (p for interaction=0.29). Of note, patients with elevated BNP also had a higher likelihood of developing ARF (OR 2.7; 95% CI 2.1– 3.6; p-value<0.001), even in absence of AHF (OR 3.00; 95% CI 2.20–4.1; p-value<0.001). Conclusions: In COVID-19, blood BNP level not only appears to be a predictor of in-hospital mortality and AHF but was also independently associated with an increased risk of ARF. This finding supports the routine use of BNP in all patients admitted to the hospital for COVID-19, regardless of a prior history of CVD.