Iustinianus Primus Faculty of Law
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://repository.ukim.mk/handle/20.500.12188/22
Browse
11 results
Search Results
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, UROPEAN EXPERIENCES OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY(IKSAD GLOBAL Publishing House, 2022-03-29) - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, ETHICS IN THE PHARMACY(IKSAD Publications – 2023, 2023) - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Applied Policies(Praven Fakultet Justinijan Prvi, 2021-05) - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, ДЕФИНИРАЊЕ НА УЛОГАТА НА ЕУ КАКО ГЛОБАЛЕН АКТЕР: ПРЕДИЗВИЦИ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВИ(Konrad Adenauer Foundation, Republic of North Macedonia Institute for Democracy “Societas Civilis”, Skopje, 2021-08) - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, THE RULE OF LAW IN THE CONTEXT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION’S WESTERN BALKANS ENLARGEMENT POLICY(Konrad Adenauer Foundation, Republic of North Macedonia Institute for Democracy “Societas Civilis”, Skopje, 2020-05) - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Twenty years of diplomatic relations between Macedonia and the United States(Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Macedonia, 2015-09)Vasko Naumovski - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, THE PROCESSES OF (DE) STABILISATION IN THE BALKANS THROUGH THE PRISM OF THE EUROPEAN INTEGRATION(Konrad Adenauer Foundation, Republic of North Macedonia / Institute for Democracy “Societas Civilis”, Skopje, 2022-01)Vasko NaumovskiWhile commemorating 70 years since the signing of the Paris Agreement1, which established the European Coal and Steel Community, in 2021 the process of European integration is not living its best days, especially not in the Balkans. The internal functional inconsistencies in the Union, the slow pace of work (partly caused by the health and economic crisis), the strengthening of national versus supranational interests, and the clear lack of leadership have significantly changed the agenda of priorities, with the usual “victim” being the expansion. At the same time, in the broader context of relations with its neighbors, the EU is facing a security crisis on its borders, and a situation which escalation would confront the Union with perhaps the greatest security challenge since its inception. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Overcoming Bilateral Disputes as Part of the EU Accession Process(European Studies Department, Faculty of Philosophy at Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, 2019-05)Vasko NaumovskiBilateral disputes have presented a significant obstacle for EU enlargement, especially in the region of South-Eastern Europe. The disputes between Slovenia and Croatia, Macedonia and Greece, Turkey and Greece/Cyprus - demonstrated the need for a more cohesive approach in order to avoid situations where bilateral issues could pose a threat to the enlargement policy. Moreover, future enlargement rounds may be endangered by additional disputes - Croatia and Serbia, Serbia and Kosovo, Albania and Serbia, etc. Historic, cultural and political issues often favor national interests, while the common European interest remains neglected. The idea for a “Europe whole, free and at peace” can be realized only with the necessary political will and courage, strong determination for completion of the European project, and continuous commitment to the process that has brought benefits to millions of European - enlargement. Instead of maintaining the fear of “importing conflicts”, EU is the most appropriate actor that can contribute to solve them, using all the tools available in the accession process. Lessons learned, existing challenges, as well as potential outcomes are analyzed in this paper. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, SOME ASPECTS OF THE ROLE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION IN THE BALKANS AFTER THE COLD WAR(Konrad Adenauer Foundation, Republic of North Macedonia / Institute for Democracy “Societas Civilis”, Skopje, 2018-12)Vasko NaumovskiEnergy and economy have become the new priorities for Russia in the Balkans, without abandoning the strategic geopolitical and security interests. The rise of the Turkish interest in the region additionally increased the need for adjustments in the post-Cold War political landscape. Shifting the United States’ focus away from the Balkans has created new opportunities for Russia, and the stalemate in the EU accession of some Balkan countries has led to modifications in their foreign policy goals. This paper examines Russia’s influence in the countries of the Balkan region, its interests in this part of Europe, as well as its relations to other (dis)integration processes. The following questions will be analysed: What were the reasons for the Soviet involvement in conflicts on the Balkans during the World Wars and the Cold War? How did Russia react to the dissolution of Yugoslavia? What were the responses of Russian foreign policy to the EU and NATO enlargement by countries in the region? What are the circumstances of the Russian position regarding the independence of Kosovo? How does the energy issue relate to the bilateral relations with the Balkan countries? What theoretical assumptions can be used to explain Russia’s policy in the region? Is Russia seeking to restore the balance of power established during the Cold War? What are the future prospects of the Russian influence in the Balkans? - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, DEFINING THE ROLE OF THE EU AS A GLOBAL ACTOR: CHALLENGES AND PERSPECTIVES(Konrad Adenauer Foundation, Republic of North Macedonia / Institute for Democracy “Societas Civilis”, Skopje, 2021-08)Vasko NaumovskiThe Union’s internal cohesion is key to the effectiveness of European responses and dealing with global crises. The EU institutions and the member states must establish a common vision that would be realized through strong coordination structures for harmonization of action and adoption of appropriate measures for increased visibility in the modern international system. The concept of the EU as a global actor that relies primarily on its soft power is a concept that belongs to the past, as it cannot provide a sufficient international presence in proportion to the size of the Union. The EU as a global power with combined power characteristics is a more appropriate concept to achieve the ambitions for influence on the international scene. The COVID-19 crisis has confirmed the thesis that the EU needs “strategic autonomy” to be able to reduce its dependence on other global actors in its foreign relations, so that it can make more autonomous decisions to promote its interests. There are several areas in which the EU has already developed appropriate instruments and initiatives to assert its authority, such as the protection of the environment and climate change, energy and transport, the digitalization process and finance, and needs to work harder to strengthen its position on dealing with modern security and defense threats. In all these areas, the EU’s normative power as a promoter of certain values is the strongest attribute it should use to maintain multilateralism through more visible participation in international organizations. The current crisis brings with it great uncertainty and unpredictability, but what is quite certain is that the map of Europe will not change. Therefore, the EU should recognize the Western Balkans as its ally and partner in the process of the continent’s unification and strengthening. Therefore, the EU should approach the region as an equal actor and include it in its foreign policy initiatives to increase continental integrity and promote common European values.