Iustinianus Primus Faculty of Law

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://repository.ukim.mk/handle/20.500.12188/22

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 14

Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
THE POTENTIAL OF ARTICLE 259 TFEU AS A TOOL FOR UPHOLDING THE MUTUAL TRUST IN THE EU
(University Josip Juraj Strossmayer of Osijek Faculty of Law Osijek, 2022)
Milena Apostolovska Stepanoska
;
Hristina Runcheva Tasev
;
Leposava Ognjanovska
T he principle of mutual trust, whose fundamental importance is recognized by the CJEU, is not mentioned in the Treaties, but nonetheless, it plays an essential role for the EU integration process and has become a structural principle of the EU law. In addition to its role as a basis for a large set of EU rules in the areas such as the internal market and the area of freedom, security and justice, this principle is also closely related to the EU founding values including the rule of law. Having in mind that is not a “blind trust” but an assumption, it is applied through ensuring compliance with the Union law for which both the Member States and the European Commission share responsibility, inter alia, by means of the infringement procedure. Under Article 259 TFEU, Member States are also entitled to bring a direct action against another Member State for an alleged infringement of an obligation under the Treaties. How ever, it is extremely rare for a Member State to take action upon the Article 259 TFEU and its potential remains untapped till now. T his contribution aims to answer why do Member States are inactive in terms of invoking the infringement procedure. It argues that infringement procedure initiated by a Member State against another Member State should not be perceived as a violation of the mutual trust be tween them but as a tool to uphold the mutual trust and to protect the Union’s founding values, including the rule of law.
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
UROPEAN EXPERIENCES OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY
(IKSAD GLOBAL Publishing House, 2022-03-29)
Milena Apostolovska Stepanoska
;
Vasko Naumovski
;
Milena Gosevska
Corporate social responsibility is the company's responsibility for the impact of its decisions and activities on society and the environment. This is achieved through transparent and ethical behavior that contributes to sustainable development and takes into account the expectations of stakeholders and is in line with international norms. Corporate social responsibility is a way of doing business. It is directly related to sustainable development requiring the company to look at its financial, social and environmental performance. The social responsibility of the company should be strategically integrated fully in the business process of the company, the supply chain, the products, as well as in the customer relations. The company's social responsibility is perfectly in line with the company's quest for easier market access, increased productivity or reduced operating costs. The authors of the paper first analyze the concept of corporate social responsibility. Here they review the legal framework of corporate social responsibility and then make a more substantial overview of corporate social responsibility in the pharmaceutical industry. This section also presents the ethics in the pharmaceutical industry as part of corporate social responsibility and corporate social responsibility. At the end, the authors present their findings from the research.
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
ETHICS IN THE PHARMACY
(IKSAD Publications – 2023, 2023)
Milena Apostolovska Stepanoska
;
Vasko Naumovski
;
Marija Nikolova
Abstract Pharmacy as an industrial branch is going through intense technological, informational and biomedical progress which brings with it a multitude of ethical challenges in their professional work. Pharmaceutical practice is increasingly changing and a new role of the pharmacist is emerging as someone who manages the given drug therapy with the aim of efficient and effective health care in the treatment process itself. At the center of pharmaceutical attention is the patient and taking responsibility for the outcome of pharmacotherapy, as well as undertaking numerous interventions aimed at maintaining or improving the quality of life (health) of the patient. Modern pharmaceutical practice implies, above all, the care of the patient's well-being and brings with it professional expectations and obligations, which can bring serious conflicts and ethical dilemmas. The World Health Organization considers the pharmaceutical profession and pharmacists as the primary level of health care and as the most accessible source of health information. The social role of the pharmacist is changing and with it the level of awareness that has a meaning of professional and work ethics is also changing. Although the health profession has long explained the corpus of ethical attitudes, developed primarily for the benefit of patients, pharmacy as a profession has a particularly pronounced distinctiveness of its ethical norms, which are divided into work and professional ethics in pharmaceutical practice, and are also different. The paper deals with a topic that has great importance and a central place in the functioning of all companies, including companies from the pharmaceutical industry.The main purpose of the research is to show the importance of professional ethics and knowledge of ethical codes, ethical principles and moral principles by pharmacists, as well as ways of making decisions in situations when pharmacists are faced with an ethical problem in the conditions of modern pharmaceutical practice, and the impact of their disregard in terms of social responsibility in corporate governance in the pharmaceutical industry
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
THE USE OF THE PRINCIPLE OF SUBSIDIARITY IN THE EU
(ISARC INTERNATIONAL SCIENCE AND ART RESEARCH CENTER, 2024)
Milena Apostolovska Stepanoska
;
Hristina Runcheva Tasev
Since the inception of the international human rights ("IHR") framework, the principle of subsidiarity has served as a cornerstone of its organizational structure. At its core, subsidiarity asserts that IHR norms are most effectively implemented at the lowest feasible level of national authority. Hence, prior to a supranational or multinational body intervening in a human rights case on a global scale, it is incumbent upon them to ensure that the primary responsibility for addressing the pertinent violation lies with the state concerned. Moreover, subsidiarity dictates that the domestic government should be afforded the optimal opportunity to devise corrective measures even after supranational authorities have investigated or adjudicated on a human rights issue. The significance of the principle of subsidiarity within IHR law can be analyzed from various perspectives. Firstly, regarding its applicability, it's recognized that adherence to decisions made by international bodies with binding authority on human rights cannot be compelled solely through subsidiarity. Thus, within the international framework, the execution of judgments from non-enforcement institutions relies on the coherence of national authorities and their utilization of policing functions to enforce IHR legislation. Moreover, a crucial rationale behind subsidiarity is that domestic authorities are better positioned to serve the objectives of IHR content and implementation accurately and effectively in the event of violations. They possess more expertise than international officials in addressing issues within their own borders. Despite IHR legislation being considered universal, subsidiarity acknowledges that each country maintains sovereignty over incidents within its territory. This recognition underscores respect for national sovereignty. The main aim of this research is to present a critical point of view over the use of the principle of subsidiarity in the EU.
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
PEJZAŽ SAJBER BEZBEDNOSTI I DIGITALNA FORENZIKA: MAKEDONSKA PERSPEKTIVA
(Fakultet organizacionih nauka, Beograd, Jove Ilića, br. 154, 2021)
Milena Apostolovska Stepanoska
;
Hristina Runcheva Tasev
Različiti pristupi sajber sigurnosti preduzeti su kao odgovor na veliki broj pretnji u sajber prostoru. Ovaj rad će istražiti makedonsko zakonodavstvo koje tretira sajber kriminal i nacionalni pristup jačanju kapaciteta sajber sigurnosti i razvoju digitalne forenzike kao neophodan odgovor na sve veći broj napada koji se dešavaju u sajber prostoru.
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
E-COMMERCE DEVELOPMENT DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: THE MACEDONIAN CASE
(Београдска академија пословних и уметничких струковних студија, 2022-06)
Milena Apostolovska Stepanoska
;
Hristina Runcheva Tasev
;
Aneta Stojanovska
In general, coronavirus has changed the way individuals, companies and countries in general have functioned so far. The pandemic left consequences in almost all segments of social life, and the reduced turnover of companies was a motive for digitalization of services. Many companies and institutions that in the past weren’t providing services electronically began to use alternative ways to offer their products and services online. The paper will present the authors' research on online shopping made during the 2020 pandemic, and will provide an overview of the challenges facing ecommerce development and will offer adequate conclusions that may be applicable in the future. Macedonians, according to the official data available from the National Bank, in the first six months of 2020 made a turnover of 4.3 billion denars with payment cards in domestic online stores, which is an increase of 113% compared to the first six months of 2019. According to the official data, in June 2020 there were 1,223 virtual points of sale, i.e. eshops, which is an increase of 20% compared to December 2019. These data as well as the findings of the authors in their research confirm the basic hypothesis that the crisis caused by Covid-19 had a positive impact on the development of e-commerce in our country.
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS OF MODERN EUROSCEPTICISM
(Institute Of Economic Development And Social Researches Publications, 2024-08)
Milena Apostolovska Stepanoska
;
Hristina Runcheva Tasev
Understanding euroscepticism goes beyond normative concerns about deepening European integration. It encompasses various aspects of political behavior, identities, public policies, democratic legitimacy, economy, ideology, and more. Euroscepticism is a complex and evolving phenomenon that lacks a universally accepted theoretical framework. Broadly, it denotes opposition to the European Union, whether in its entirety as a supranational entity or in its current structure, form, and political trajectory. Furthermore, euroscepticism manifests across the political spectrum, from left to right. Factors such as economic crises, fiscal policies, and the refugee crisis have intensified negative sentiments toward the EU among its populace. This environment has fostered the growth of eurosceptic parties and groups espousing populist and nationalist agendas. This study aims to delineate the contemporary dimensions of euroscepticism within the EU, following a review of the theoretical framework and essential conceptual clarifications related to euroscepticism. The results indicate that euroscepticism primarily revolves around concerns regarding sovereignty, identity, and the level of trust in national political systems. Additionally, euroscepticism correlates with the two significant crises that have challenged the EU and considerably tarnished its reputation: the economic crisis and the refugee crisis.
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Applied Policies
(Praven Fakultet Justinijan Prvi, 2021-05)
Zoran Ilievski
;
Vladimir Bozinovski
;
Vasko Naumovski
;
Hristina Runcheva Tasev
;
Milena Apostolovska Stepanoska
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Union based on the rule of law: the Court of Justice of the European Union and the (future of) European integration
(Eastern Journal of European Studies, 2020-12)
Milena Apostolovska Stepanoska
;
Hristina Runcheva Tasev
;
Leposava Ognjanovska
The judicial contribution to the dynamic process of European Integration was especially important, as the Court of Justice of the EU, through its creative and extensive interpretation of the Treaties, became an important catalyst for the integration process. The next phase of the European integration seems to be the ‘integration through the rule of law’, as the further development of this process must be based on a secure and solid ground, reaffirming the Union as a community of values. Given its importance for the confidence of citizens in the Union and the effective delivery of policies, the rule of law is of central relevance to the future of Europe. The main aim of this paper is to examine the progressive and influential role of the CJEU regarding the integration process, as a starting premise for determining its potential as an actor in the process of overcoming the following challenges.
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
ДЕФИНИРАЊЕ НА УЛОГАТА НА ЕУ КАКО ГЛОБАЛЕН АКТЕР: ПРЕДИЗВИЦИ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВИ
(Konrad Adenauer Foundation, Republic of North Macedonia Institute for Democracy “Societas Civilis”, Skopje, 2021-08)
Milena Apostolovska Stepanoska
;
Vasko Naumovski
;
Leposava Ognjanovska
Улогата и позицијата на Европската Унија како глобален актер на меѓународната сцена се базираат врз тезата дека креирањето на Унијата е со цел да се стави крај на геополитиката, чие вообичаено поимање се надоврзува на сфаќањето на динамичната моќ во меѓународните односи. ЕУ промовира нов концепт на безбедност заснован на меѓузависност и пренесен суверенитет на заеднички воспоставените институции. Одржувањето на мирот на европското тло било замислено да се одвива преку економска соработка на земјите-членки што понатаму би довела до нивна меѓусебна солидарност, што се предвидува и во Шумановата декларација од 1950 година. Либералниот светски поредок по Втората светска војна се темели на мултилатерализмот, како надворешна политика што ја практикуваат повеќе актери на меѓународната сцена, врз основа на доброволна и (во суштина) институционализирана соработка регулирана со норми и принципи кои важат (во голема мера) подеднакво за сите држави-учеснички, заради заедничко соочување со споделените проблеми и предизвици.1 Како продукт на мултилатерализмот, ЕУ повеќе децении наназад ја игнорираше „политиката на моќ“ и се концентрираше на економската интеграција2, иако причините за формирањето на овој sui generis конструкт на меѓународното право се примарно од безбедносно-сигурносен карактер. Во надворешните односи, ЕУ се перципира како „мека сила“ што ги промовира демократијата и основните права потпирајќи се на инструментите на „мека моќ“, како ефективна замена за воената моќ, односно безбедносната и одбранбена политика во однос на која земјите-членки се потпираа на водството на САД во рамките на Трансатлантскиот сојуз. Со Лисабонскиот договор, ЕУ стекна меѓународен правен субјективитет, така што може да ги остварува надлежностите во надворешната политика, вклучително и да учествува во работата на меѓународните организации, во границите на овластувањата што ѝ се пренесени од страна на земјите-членки.

Iustinianus Primus Faculty of Law

Browse

Filters

Settings

Sort By

Results per page

Search Results