Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/8084
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSerafimov, Markoen_US
dc.contributor.authorMojsovski, Filipen_US
dc.contributor.authorShesho, Igoren_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-10T20:59:59Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-10T20:59:59Z-
dc.date.issued2017-10-
dc.identifier.isbn978-86-6055-098-1-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/8084-
dc.description.abstractIn according to Directive 2010/31/EU, the concept of Cost-Optimality was setting the energy performance requirements in the MS building codes. Particularly, the Commission established a comparative framework methodology for calculating cost-optimal levels of minimum energy performance for building. The same Directive also introduces the concept of nearly Zero-Energy Buildings (nZEB) stating that all new buildings by the end of 2020 must be nZEB. The cost-optimal methodology helps to understand and manage the implications of implementing requirements for nZEB.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Mechanical Engineering in Nisen_US
dc.subjectcost-optimal levels, comparative framework methodology, Directive 2010/31/EU (EPBD recast), EED Directive 2012/27/EU, nearly Zero-Energy Buildingsen_US
dc.titleConvergence Between Cost-Optimality and Nearly Zero-Energy Buildingsen_US
dc.typeProceeding articleen_US
dc.relation.conference18th Symposium on Thermal Science and Engineering of Serbia, SIMTERM 2017en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Mechanical Engineering-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Mechanical Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Mechanical Engineering: Conference papers
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

92
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Jul 24, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.