Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/7072
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTasevska Hadji Boshkova, Iskraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-29T13:41:23Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-29T13:41:23Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationЗборник Истина, мистификация, лъжа в славянските езици, литератури и култури. София: Лектура, 2011, 502-508.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-954-92732-1-2-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/7072-
dc.description.abstractFocusing the relationship between fact and fiction is one of the main domains of the theory of literature, as well as that of the artistic literature. First question about the way fictional truth is being realized directs us to the theoretical acknowledgements of Michael Riffaterre, concerning the relation between truth and verisimilitude. Approaching this problem, Riffaterre avoids confrontation with the preceding theories of mimesis, actually with those that are in search of discovering fictional into the representation, enabling opposite approach. The second argument refers to the historicity, a notion that would be easily defined as something divergent from what is historical. Historicity is vigorously connected with memory and recollection, as a second level of temporalization, where intelligibility is empowered, and ontological density is being suspended. This categories are intrinsically imposed on travel writings and aphorisms of Dzinot, as polyvalent, hybrid genres, and not-well theoretically determined. To certain extent, Dzinot’s travel writings are marked with objective voice toward the observed reality (he is an observer, and not self-observer of his own travel), while the following two collections of aphorisms depict one dominant tendency-individual perception of the world under the cultural and political circumstances, as well as the tight correlation between the subjectivity and the universal “truth”.en_US
dc.language.isomken_US
dc.publisherЛектураen_US
dc.subjectfictional truth, verisimilitude, historicity, travel writing, aphorismen_US
dc.titleВистината како преобразена веродостојност – имплицитната историчност во патописите и афоризмите на Јордан Хаџи Константинов Џинотen_US
dc.typeBook chapteren_US
dc.relation.conferenceДесетти национални славистички читања, одржани на 22-24 април 2010 год. на Универзитетот „Св. Климент Охридски“ во Софија.en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptBlaze Koneski" Faculty of Philology-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Philology: Conference papers
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Вистината како преобразена веродостојност.pdf249.5 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

109
checked on Mar 28, 2024

Download(s)

254
checked on Mar 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.