Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/33414
Title: COMPARISON OF MAXIMAL OXYGEN CONSUMPTION, RESTING METABOLIC RATE AND BODY COMPOSITION ANALYSIS BETWEEN AEROBIC AND ANAEROBIC SPORTS
Authors: Nestorova Brazanska, Mihaela 
Dejanova, Beti 
Karagjozova, Ivanka 
Spirkoska Vangelovska, Biljana 
Bogdanovska, K
Keywords: sports
body composition
resting metabolic rate
maximal oxygen consumption
Issue Date: 2024
Publisher: Faculty of Physical Education, Sport and Health in Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
Journal: Research in Physical Education, Sport and Health
Series/Report no.: 13;1
Abstract: The aim of this study is to compare the values of maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max), resting metabolic rate (RMR) and body composition between aerobic and anaerobic sports. 90 male subjects (25,34 ±5,6 age; 179,78±6.9 height/cm; 78,66±6,9 weight/kg; 24,34±2,75 BMI; 13,1±5,53 percentage body fat-PBF and 49,7±3,2 % skeletal muscle mass-% SMM) were tested for this study. The subjects were divided in 2 groups, I group- aerobic sports (endurance) (n=63), II group- anaerobic (strength) sports (n=26). Height was measured with stadiometer - СЕКА, body composition with bioelectrical impedance analysis - InBody 720, (Great Britain), RMR with indirect calorimetry- Fit Mate, COSMED, (Italy) and VO2 max with ergometric test Bruce on treadmill (ergo _run medical_α 24). Results showed that anaerobic sports have significantly higher values for weight, BMI and PBF compared to aerobic, while aerobic sports have significantly higher values for % SMM and VO2 max (p<0,05) and higher values for RMR compared to anaerobic sports. SMM has an impact on RMR in athletes. To keep high SMM, endurance athletes need to have higher caloric intake. To achieve higher VO2 max values and better performance athletes tend to have combined submaximal and maximal training sessions.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/33414
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
26-vol-13-no1.pdf127.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.