Ве молиме користете го овој идентификатор да го цитирате или поврзете овој запис: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/33095
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBucevska, Vesnaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMerdzan, Gunteren_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-21T08:45:37Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-21T08:45:37Z-
dc.date.issued2024-09-29-
dc.identifier.citationVesna Bucevska & Gunter Merdzan, 2024. "Foreign Direct Investment, Domestic Investment, And The Role Of Institutions In Central, Eastern, And South-Eastern Europe," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 69(242), pages 27-68, July – Se.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/33095-
dc.description.abstractThe paper examines the relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI) and domestic investment in Central, Eastern, and South-Eastern European (CESEE) countries from 1995 to 2021. The primary hypothesis posits that FDI exerts a positive influence on domestic investment, with variations observed across diverse institutional contexts. The research utilises fixed effects and a one-step difference generalised method of moments (GMM) to determine whether FDI leads to an increase or decrease in domestic investment in CESEE countries. The findings indicate that FDI has a favourable and statistically significant influence on domestic investment. However, the coefficients for FDI are less than one, indicating that while FDI stimulates overall investment, it does not create a crowding-in effect where the rise in total investment surpasses the FDI inflows. When the data is split on the basis of institutional quality, it is evident that FDI continues to positively impact domestic investment in high and low-institutional- quality settings. The coefficients for FDI in both subgroups are less than one, implying that institutional quality does not substantially change the correlation between FDI and domestic investment. These results indicate the positive and significant impact of FDI on domestic investment, without crowding-in effects for the entire sample of CESEE economies and both subgroups that differ in institutional quality.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Economics, University of Belgrade, Serbiaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEconomic Annalsen_US
dc.subjectDomestic investment, foreign direct investment, economic growth, fixed effects, GMMen_US
dc.titleFOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT, DOMESTIC INVESTMENT, AND THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS IN CENTRAL, EASTERN, AND SOUTH-EASTERN EUROPEen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doiDOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/EKA2442027B (https://doi.org/10.2298/EKA2442027B)-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Economics-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Economics-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Economics 03: Journal Articles / Статии во научни списанија
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
FDI, Domestic Investment and the Role of Institutions.pdf1.52 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Прикажи едноставен запис

Page view(s)

40
checked on 3.5.2025

Download(s)

1
checked on 3.5.2025

Google ScholarTM

Проверете

Altmetric


Записите во DSpace се заштитени со авторски права, со сите права задржани, освен ако не е поинаку наведено.