КОМПАРАТИВНА АНАЛИЗА НА МЕХАНИЗМИТЕ НА УПАТСТВА ЗА ОДМЕРУВАЊЕ КАЗНА: УПАТСТВОТО ЗА ОДМЕРУВАЊЕ КАЗНА ВО САД
Date Issued
2014
Author(s)
Gruevska Drakulevski, Aleksandra
Abstract
In this article the authors provide a comparative analysis of the sentencing guidelines
mechanisms, with a particular emphasizes on the United States Sentencing Guidelines.
The authors summarized the present United States Sentencing Guidelines in order to
point to it as a positive example of application. The idea is to present the origin model
in a way that would be useful to enhance the Sentencing Guidelines recently applied in the
criminal justice system of the Republic of Macedonia. The authors present the
methodological approach for the creation of the Guidelines in the United States, and
briefly present its content.
The authors of the article conclude that the issue of judicial sentencing policy is a
question thatrequires continuesresearch and settingmethodology for monitoring the
sentencing policy of the courts on the territory of the whole country. Sentencing is a
dynamic field that requires continuous monitoring and review of penal policy in
accordance with the experiences of the application and learning what motivates and
controls criminal behaviour. Hence, the authors of the article, following the example of
many other countries, problematize the question of the necessity of establishing a
permanent professional expert body which would monitor the sentencing practicesin the
Republic of Macedonia and would issue sentencing guidelines or these issues should
continue to be resolved by legal opinions and general positions of the Supreme Court of
the Republic of Macedonia.
mechanisms, with a particular emphasizes on the United States Sentencing Guidelines.
The authors summarized the present United States Sentencing Guidelines in order to
point to it as a positive example of application. The idea is to present the origin model
in a way that would be useful to enhance the Sentencing Guidelines recently applied in the
criminal justice system of the Republic of Macedonia. The authors present the
methodological approach for the creation of the Guidelines in the United States, and
briefly present its content.
The authors of the article conclude that the issue of judicial sentencing policy is a
question thatrequires continuesresearch and settingmethodology for monitoring the
sentencing policy of the courts on the territory of the whole country. Sentencing is a
dynamic field that requires continuous monitoring and review of penal policy in
accordance with the experiences of the application and learning what motivates and
controls criminal behaviour. Hence, the authors of the article, following the example of
many other countries, problematize the question of the necessity of establishing a
permanent professional expert body which would monitor the sentencing practicesin the
Republic of Macedonia and would issue sentencing guidelines or these issues should
continue to be resolved by legal opinions and general positions of the Supreme Court of
the Republic of Macedonia.
Subjects
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
КОМПАРАТИВНА АНАЛИЗА НА МЕХАНИЗМИТЕ НА УПАТСТВА ЗА ОДМЕРУВАЊЕ КАЗНА.pdf
Size
566.05 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):1b7400eaa7e3f192d356cbcf42b143ee