Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/16961
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDeskoski, Tonien_US
dc.contributor.authorDokovski, Vangelen_US
dc.contributor.authorKocev, Ljubenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-14T10:37:39Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-14T10:37:39Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationDeskoski, T. Dokovski, V. Kocev, Lj. (2021). (De)localization of Arbitration - Online vs. Offline Arbitration - E-arbitration in time of Covid 19. Iustinianus Primus Law Review Vol 12. Issue 2.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/16961-
dc.description.abstract“We are living in unprecedented times” - a statement in all aspects of our lives for the past year. This is also valid for international commercial arbitration. Like never before COVID 19 is changing and reshaping the world of arbitration. From expensive places for arbitral hearings to online platforms, from in-person hearings to virtual hearings. The direct impact of the lack of universal lex arbitri can be observed in the field of online and offline arbitration. In this sense, the terms “online” and “offline” arbitration are used to demonstrate the difference between in-person and virtual conduct of the arbitration. Traditional arbitration is converting into e-arbitration. By doing so, many national legislators and arbitral institutions are modernizing their rules just to provide an appropriate framework for e-arbitration. However, some of the theoretical concepts are more vivid now than before. The detach of international arbitration as a concept in the arbitration theory once again is attracting the attention of many legal scholars. Adapt, improve, and overcome – is the new standard in international arbitration. And this standard needs to fit with the basic principle of international commercial arbitration – due process and right to be heard.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Law Iustinianus Primusen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIustinianus Primus Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjecte-arbitration, lex arbitri, delocalization, seat of arbitration.en_US
dc.title(De)localization of Arbitration - Online vs. Offline Arbitration - E-arbitration in time of Covid 19en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Economics-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Economics 03: Journal Articles / Статии во научни списанија
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
10. Deskoski, Dokovski, Kocevdocx.pdf420.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

91
checked on Apr 28, 2024

Download(s)

144
checked on Apr 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.