Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/13028| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | G. Pavlovska, T. Stafilov, K. Čundeva, | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-02T09:21:47Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-06-02T09:21:47Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 1998 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/13028 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Fresenius’ Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 361, 213–216 (1998). | en_US |
| dc.title | Comparison of hexamethylenedithiocarbamate and tetramethylenedithiocarbamate as flotation reagents for the concentration of zinc | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/s002160050865 | - |
| item.grantfulltext | none | - |
| item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics: Journal Articles | |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.