Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/10884
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTomasevic, Igoren_US
dc.contributor.authorBahelka, Ivanen_US
dc.contributor.authorČítek, Jaroslaven_US
dc.contributor.authorČandek-Potokar, Marjetaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDjekić, Ilijaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGetya, Andriyen_US
dc.contributor.authorGuerrero, Luisen_US
dc.contributor.authorIvanova, Sonyaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKušec, Goranen_US
dc.contributor.authorNakov, Dimitaren_US
dc.contributor.authorSołowiej, Bartoszen_US
dc.contributor.authorStoica, Maricicaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSzabó, Csabaen_US
dc.contributor.authorTudoreanu, Lilianaen_US
dc.contributor.authorWeiler, Ulrikeen_US
dc.contributor.authorFont-i-Furnols, Mariaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-15T08:23:14Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-15T08:23:14Z-
dc.date.issued2020-07-17-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/10884-
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>The aim of this exploratory work, because of the existing bias on the size of the sample and some of the sociodemographic characteristics of the participants, was to investigate the Eastern European consumers’ beliefs and attitudes toward animal welfare, to perform a cross-country segmentation analysis and to observe possible differences with their Western European counterparts. For this purpose, a survey was conducted with 5508 consumers from 13 Eastern European countries (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Croatia, North Macedonia, Hungary, Moldova, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, and Ukraine) using a questionnaire with nine statements about consumers beliefs regarding animal welfare (aspects of management, ethical issues about animals, and consequences of animal welfare on meat quality and price), one statement about the willingness to pay more for meat produced under better welfare conditions, and four statements regarding attitudes toward animal welfare. Differences between countries were detected for all the statements. Moreover, three clusters of consumers were identified: one with consumers indifferent towards animal welfare; one with consumers concerned about animal welfare, but they believe it is difficult to achieve; and one with consumers concerned about animal welfare, and they believe it is possible to achieve it.</jats:p>en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnimalsen_US
dc.subjectcluster; management; ethical; meat qualityen_US
dc.titleAttitudes and Beliefs of Eastern European Consumers Towards Animal Welfareen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ani10071220-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/7/1220/pdf-
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.issue7-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Agricultural Sciences and Food-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Food: Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
23.1. animals-10-01220.pdf430.12 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

46
checked on Apr 29, 2024

Download(s)

13
checked on Apr 29, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.