Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/10249
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVankovska, Biljanaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-24T03:05:24Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-24T03:05:24Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationVankovska, B. (2020). “The Chimera of Colorful Revolution in Macedonia: Collective Action in the European Periphery”, Balkanologie, vol. 15, no. 2, 2020.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/10249-
dc.description.abstractMacedonia, as a hardly known part of ex-Yugoslavia at the European periphery, has rarely made Western headlines except for the security problems too often associated with the region and the country’s bizarre “name issue.”1 Yet for a brief moment in 2014-2016, it seemed as if a sudden upsurge of social movements and popular protests would put it on the world map of countries experiencing collective actions and calls for radical social change. Many saw this upsurge as an encouraging development in a country burdened by democratic deficit and a hybrid illiberal regime, hoping that it could be part of a “Balkan Spring” (with similar events occurring in Croatia and Bosnia- Herzegovina).2 The developments became especially widely known because of the final act of the performance – the so-called Colorful Revolution (CR) of 2016 – when protesters used paintballs of diverse colors to shoot official buildings and monuments. However, the collective action stopped abruptly in mid-2016, as societal energy dried up like rain water in a desert.This study sheds light on the reasons for and the context of the sudden surge and deflation of popular mobilization, as well as the general effects of the events as seen from the distance of five years’ time. The text structure is determined by the predominantly socio-historical approach of the analysis: the first part sketches the historical context with special emphasis on the way Macedonia has been governed – both internally and externally – since the breakup of Yugoslavia in 1991. Its aim is to present the main features of the political and institutional landscape before the phase of collective actions began in 2014. The second part focuses on the specific grassroots movement in which multiple plenums formed (plenumization), while the third part questions the very nature of the Colorful Revolution, its end and its after-effects. The conclusion summarizes what the study reveals about collective action.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBalkanologie. Revue d'études pluridisciplinairesen_US
dc.relationPour une approche socio-historique de l'action collective dans les Balkansen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBalkanologie. Revue d'études pluridisciplinairesen_US
dc.subjectcollective action, Macedonia, protests, movements, peripheryen_US
dc.titleThe Chimera of Colorful Revolution in Macedonia: Collective Action in the European Peripheryen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4000/balkanologie.2583-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Philosophy-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Philosophy 04: Journal Articles / Статии во научни списанија
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
balkanologie-article.pdfThe Chimera of Colorful Revolution in Macedonia: Collective Action in the European Periphery453.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

92
checked on Apr 18, 2024

Download(s)

201
checked on Apr 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.