Repository logo
Communities & Collections
Research Outputs
Fundings & Projects
People
Statistics
User Manual
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Food
  3. Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Food: Journal Articles
  4. Spatial clusters of Varroa destructor control strategies in Europe
Details

Spatial clusters of Varroa destructor control strategies in Europe

Journal
Journal of Pest Science
Date Issued
2022-06-29
Author(s)
Brodschneider, Robert
Schlagbauer, Johannes
Arakelyan, Iliyana
Ballis, Alexis
Brus, Jan
Brusbardis, Valters
Cadahía, Luis
Charrière, Jean-Daniel
Chlebo, Robert
Coffey, Mary F.
Cornelissen, Bram
da Costa, Cristina Amaro
Danneels, Ellen
Danihlík, Jiří
Dobrescu, Constantin
Evans, Garth
Fedoriak, Mariia
Forsythe, Ivan
Gregorc, Aleš
Johannesen, Jes
Kauko, Lassi
Kristiansen, Preben
Martikkala, Maritta
Martín-Hernández, Raquel
Mazur, Ewa
Mutinelli, Franco
Patalano, Solenn
Raudmets, Aivar
Simon Delso, Noa
Stevanovic, Jevrosima
Vejsnæs, Flemming
Williams, Anthony
Gray, Alison
DOI
10.1007/s10340-022-01523-2
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Beekeepers have various options to control the parasitic mite <jats:italic>Varroa destructor</jats:italic> in honey bee colonies, but no empirical data are available on the methods they apply in practice. We surveyed 28,409 beekeepers maintaining 507,641 colonies in 30 European countries concerning <jats:italic>Varroa</jats:italic> control methods. The set of 19 different <jats:italic>Varroa</jats:italic> diagnosis and control measures was taken from the annual COLOSS questionnaire on honey bee colony losses. The most frequent activities were monitoring of <jats:italic>Varroa</jats:italic> infestations, drone brood removal, various oxalic acid applications and formic acid applications. Correspondence analysis and hierarchical clustering on principal components showed that six <jats:italic>Varroa</jats:italic> control options (not necessarily the most used ones) significantly contribute to defining three distinctive clusters of countries in terms of <jats:italic>Varroa</jats:italic> control in Europe. Cluster I (eight Western European countries) is characterized by use of amitraz strips. Cluster II comprises 15 countries from Scandinavia, the Baltics, and Central-Southern Europe. This cluster is characterized by long-term formic acid treatments. Cluster III is characterized by dominant usage of amitraz fumigation and formed by seven Eastern European countries. The median number of different treatments applied per beekeeper was lowest in cluster III. Based on estimation of colony numbers in included countries, we extrapolated the proportions of colonies treated with different methods in Europe. This suggests that circa 62% of colonies in Europe are treated with amitraz, followed by oxalic acid for the next largest percentage of colonies. We discuss possible factors determining the choice of <jats:italic>Varroa</jats:italic> control measures in the different clusters.</jats:p>
Subjects

Apis mellifera · COLO...

⠀

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify