THE INFLUENCE OF THE LUSTRATION PROCESSES ON THE POSTCOMMUNIST TRANSITIONS IN EUROPE
Date Issued
2019-10
Author(s)
Abstract
The fall of the Berlin Wall opened the gate to democracy for the post-communist
countries in Europe. However, the road towards democracy in all post-communist
countries in Europe proved to be very difficult. One of the main questions concerning
democracy was what to do with the problematic communist totalitarian
past: to forgive and forget or to punish and remember. Most of the post-communist
countries in Europe decided to punish and remember their communist past. That is
why 14 countries in Europe decided to implement the process of lustration in order
to confront with their communist past. There is a huge diversity in the way and
the time lustration has been enforced. Some countries decided to implement this
controversial mechanism immediately after the fall of the Berlin Wall, while others
decided to do this many years after the beginning of transition. Some of them decided
to ground the lustration processes on retributive justice while others decided
to connect lustration with restorative justice. In addition to the diversity of manner
and time lustration was enforced, there is a diversity of implementation effects. In
some countries, lustration has improved democracy, but in others, it has split the
county and had a negative impact on democracy. The paper deals with the manner
and time of lustration in post-communist countries in Europe, and with the effects
of implementation on democratic consolidation. The main methods used include
analysis, historical, normative and political method. The conclusion is that although
the process of lustration leaves plenty of space for manipulation, well-implemented
and well-regulated lustration, following the recommendations of the Council of Europe,
has had a positive impact on democratic consolidation of the post-communist
countries.
countries in Europe. However, the road towards democracy in all post-communist
countries in Europe proved to be very difficult. One of the main questions concerning
democracy was what to do with the problematic communist totalitarian
past: to forgive and forget or to punish and remember. Most of the post-communist
countries in Europe decided to punish and remember their communist past. That is
why 14 countries in Europe decided to implement the process of lustration in order
to confront with their communist past. There is a huge diversity in the way and
the time lustration has been enforced. Some countries decided to implement this
controversial mechanism immediately after the fall of the Berlin Wall, while others
decided to do this many years after the beginning of transition. Some of them decided
to ground the lustration processes on retributive justice while others decided
to connect lustration with restorative justice. In addition to the diversity of manner
and time lustration was enforced, there is a diversity of implementation effects. In
some countries, lustration has improved democracy, but in others, it has split the
county and had a negative impact on democracy. The paper deals with the manner
and time of lustration in post-communist countries in Europe, and with the effects
of implementation on democratic consolidation. The main methods used include
analysis, historical, normative and political method. The conclusion is that although
the process of lustration leaves plenty of space for manipulation, well-implemented
and well-regulated lustration, following the recommendations of the Council of Europe,
has had a positive impact on democratic consolidation of the post-communist
countries.
Subjects
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
2. 1-5 и 54 Апстракт Дубровник 2019.pdf
Size
319.8 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):f85e2a73e06283a389c021a147293046