MANAGING PROGRESSIVE BUSINESS MODELS IN FUNCTION OF INCREASED ROLE-BASED ENGAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY, EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF JAPAN AND NORTH MACEDONIA
Date Issued
2024-06-21
Author(s)
Susai, Masayuki
Spasovska Monika
DOI
http://sam-d.si/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/SAM-2024-Belgrade_Book-of-abstracts_final.pdf
Abstract
Theoretical Background
The process of creating the concept of ‘human-centered management’ undoubtedly implies to
the tendency for progressive and paradoxical modelling of 5 prevalent pillars to achieving the
organizational quality, among which disruption resilience and agility constitute the key features
of the contemporary paradoxical leaders. Latest tendencies of the WEF, which principally
reflect the fundamental reset from the ‘Great Reset Initiative’ (WEF, January, 2021), towards
‘Navigating Global Challenges’, (WEF, January, 2024) is a prior indicator of paradoxical
understanding of critical transformative challenges, aimed at increased commitment and
accountability, reflecting on one hand the behavioral changes, alongside with empowerment
and employee engagement, connected to the competitiveness changes, on the other hand.
Purpose of study
Fundamental purpose of this methodological-empirical study is placed at building up and
validating, through designed Questionnaire, the mutual causality among pillars of
organizational stability within the ‘human-centered management’, specifically disruption
resilience and agility, with the critical behavioral employee orientations, particularly with the
accountability and effective employee engagement, both of them tested within the process of
managing ‘progressive business models’. In this context, corrective variables in the modelling
phase would be paradoxical implications of disruptive innovations, focused on establishing the
social concept of ‘responsible enterprise’.
Research method
Principal research hypothesis in this scientific-research paper is determined as: Identifying and
measuring the degree of causality between human-centered management pillars in relation to
behavioral and competitive changes, through socially responsible behavior. Designed
Questionnaire would be applied to representative sample of 50 SME’s, 25 from Japan and North
Macedonia, which would be subject to holistic qualitative analyzes.Findings
Expected findings from this scientific-research paper are identified as:
• Progressive identifying, analyzing, validating and modelling of contemporary, critical-
to-quality organizational pillars, with the research focus on representative sample of 50
Macedonian and Japanese businesses, at paradoxical harmonization of behavioral and
competitive changes, i.e.:
1) commitment and accountability, as well as,
2) empowerment and employee engagement.
• Developing a pathway for a holistic, transformative and integrated application of
progressive business models, for dynamic understanding of the milestone of advanced
excellence, i.e. the focus of the managers as leaders of changes.
Theoretical Contribution
The prevalent impornatce and applicability of the Cabality Management Development Process
(Beaulieu & LeBlanc, 2012), would be analyzed within the fundamental determinants of
advanced managing of progressive business models (O’Higgins Eleanor & Laszlo Zsolnai Ed.,
2018), particularly from the view-point of socially responsible actions and sustainable
development models. It would encounter our immense scientific-research focus, the process of
identifying the comparability of empirical research findings out of advanced Japanese
businesses with the tendencies arising within the EU, in order to detail the intended managerial
steps for a proper and vivid managing in times of dynamic paradoxes in North Macedonia.
Practical Implications
Applicative importance of the entire empirical reseach analyses within this paper would lead to
the following expected practical implications:
• Statistically developed and sustained research findings, from methodological and
empirical point of view, which leads to an accomodated, inter-related and integrated
modalities of behavioaral and competitive changes,
• Clearing-up the mutual dependence among capability-based management model in
comparison with the socially-responsible model for managing sustainable and pro-
active businesses. References
1. Cronin J. Mary, Dearing C. Tiziana Editors (2017), Managing for Social Impact:
Innovations in Responsible Enterprises, Springer International Publ. AG, Switzerland
2. Lepeley Maria-Teresa (2017), Human Centered Management: 5 Pillars of
Organizational Quality and Global Sustainability, Greenleaf Publishing Limited, UK,
3. O’Higgins Eleanor & Laszlo Zsolnai Ed. (2018), Progressive Business Models:
Creating Sustainable and Pro-social Enterprise, Palgrave Studies in Sustainable
Business in Association with Future Earth,
4. Young F. Stephen, Lisa A. Steelman, Matthew D. Pita & James Gallo (2020), Role-
based engagement: scale development and validation, Journal of Management &
Organization, pp. 1 – 21 etc.
The process of creating the concept of ‘human-centered management’ undoubtedly implies to
the tendency for progressive and paradoxical modelling of 5 prevalent pillars to achieving the
organizational quality, among which disruption resilience and agility constitute the key features
of the contemporary paradoxical leaders. Latest tendencies of the WEF, which principally
reflect the fundamental reset from the ‘Great Reset Initiative’ (WEF, January, 2021), towards
‘Navigating Global Challenges’, (WEF, January, 2024) is a prior indicator of paradoxical
understanding of critical transformative challenges, aimed at increased commitment and
accountability, reflecting on one hand the behavioral changes, alongside with empowerment
and employee engagement, connected to the competitiveness changes, on the other hand.
Purpose of study
Fundamental purpose of this methodological-empirical study is placed at building up and
validating, through designed Questionnaire, the mutual causality among pillars of
organizational stability within the ‘human-centered management’, specifically disruption
resilience and agility, with the critical behavioral employee orientations, particularly with the
accountability and effective employee engagement, both of them tested within the process of
managing ‘progressive business models’. In this context, corrective variables in the modelling
phase would be paradoxical implications of disruptive innovations, focused on establishing the
social concept of ‘responsible enterprise’.
Research method
Principal research hypothesis in this scientific-research paper is determined as: Identifying and
measuring the degree of causality between human-centered management pillars in relation to
behavioral and competitive changes, through socially responsible behavior. Designed
Questionnaire would be applied to representative sample of 50 SME’s, 25 from Japan and North
Macedonia, which would be subject to holistic qualitative analyzes.Findings
Expected findings from this scientific-research paper are identified as:
• Progressive identifying, analyzing, validating and modelling of contemporary, critical-
to-quality organizational pillars, with the research focus on representative sample of 50
Macedonian and Japanese businesses, at paradoxical harmonization of behavioral and
competitive changes, i.e.:
1) commitment and accountability, as well as,
2) empowerment and employee engagement.
• Developing a pathway for a holistic, transformative and integrated application of
progressive business models, for dynamic understanding of the milestone of advanced
excellence, i.e. the focus of the managers as leaders of changes.
Theoretical Contribution
The prevalent impornatce and applicability of the Cabality Management Development Process
(Beaulieu & LeBlanc, 2012), would be analyzed within the fundamental determinants of
advanced managing of progressive business models (O’Higgins Eleanor & Laszlo Zsolnai Ed.,
2018), particularly from the view-point of socially responsible actions and sustainable
development models. It would encounter our immense scientific-research focus, the process of
identifying the comparability of empirical research findings out of advanced Japanese
businesses with the tendencies arising within the EU, in order to detail the intended managerial
steps for a proper and vivid managing in times of dynamic paradoxes in North Macedonia.
Practical Implications
Applicative importance of the entire empirical reseach analyses within this paper would lead to
the following expected practical implications:
• Statistically developed and sustained research findings, from methodological and
empirical point of view, which leads to an accomodated, inter-related and integrated
modalities of behavioaral and competitive changes,
• Clearing-up the mutual dependence among capability-based management model in
comparison with the socially-responsible model for managing sustainable and pro-
active businesses. References
1. Cronin J. Mary, Dearing C. Tiziana Editors (2017), Managing for Social Impact:
Innovations in Responsible Enterprises, Springer International Publ. AG, Switzerland
2. Lepeley Maria-Teresa (2017), Human Centered Management: 5 Pillars of
Organizational Quality and Global Sustainability, Greenleaf Publishing Limited, UK,
3. O’Higgins Eleanor & Laszlo Zsolnai Ed. (2018), Progressive Business Models:
Creating Sustainable and Pro-social Enterprise, Palgrave Studies in Sustainable
Business in Association with Future Earth,
4. Young F. Stephen, Lisa A. Steelman, Matthew D. Pita & James Gallo (2020), Role-
based engagement: scale development and validation, Journal of Management &
Organization, pp. 1 – 21 etc.
Subjects
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
SAM-2024-Belgrade_Book-of-abstracts_final.pdf
Description
Book of Abstracts of 7th International Conference on Management and Organization: MANAGING PARADOXES IN AND ACROSS ORGANIZATIONS
Size
3.25 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):a3c03f7e487346d673f0bb00bb2c8309