A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF IDENTITY ASSURANCE: KANTARA, EIDAS, AND REFEDS PERSPECTIVES ON LOA
Journal
JNSM Journal of Natural Sciences and Mathematics of UT
Date Issued
2024-10-10
Author(s)
Shemshi, Vjollca
Abstract
In the contemporary era marked by the pervasive use of digital devices, safeguarding electronic identity has
become indispensable for ensuring secure and dependable interactions within federated systems. This paper
undertakes a comparative analysis of identity assurance frameworks, with a specific focus on the perspectives
provided by Kantara, eIDAS, and REFEDS systems concerning Levels of Assurance (LoA), which involves
examining various aspects of their identity assurance frameworks, standards, and implementations.
Although Kantara, eIDAS, and REFEDS share a common goal of increasing identity assurance and trust in
federated systems, they differ in their scope, regulatory mandates, LoA frameworks, and approaches to adoption
and implementation. Understanding these differences is essential for organizations looking to navigate the
complex landscape of identity management and choose the most appropriate frameworks for their specific
needs.
Through a meticulous review of each framework, this study delves into the foundational principles,
methodologies, and implementations underpinning identity assurance within federated systems. By scrutinizing
the perspectives of Kantara, eIDAS, and REFEDS, this analysis elucidates the similarities, distinctions,
strengths, and limitations of each framework in tackling identity assurance challenges.
Furthermore, this study explores the implications for future research and development in federated identity
management, providing higher security of the electronic identities of users of federated systems. By fostering
a deeper understanding of identity assurance frameworks, this comparative analysis contributes to the
advancement of secure and trusted digital interactions in various organizational systems.
become indispensable for ensuring secure and dependable interactions within federated systems. This paper
undertakes a comparative analysis of identity assurance frameworks, with a specific focus on the perspectives
provided by Kantara, eIDAS, and REFEDS systems concerning Levels of Assurance (LoA), which involves
examining various aspects of their identity assurance frameworks, standards, and implementations.
Although Kantara, eIDAS, and REFEDS share a common goal of increasing identity assurance and trust in
federated systems, they differ in their scope, regulatory mandates, LoA frameworks, and approaches to adoption
and implementation. Understanding these differences is essential for organizations looking to navigate the
complex landscape of identity management and choose the most appropriate frameworks for their specific
needs.
Through a meticulous review of each framework, this study delves into the foundational principles,
methodologies, and implementations underpinning identity assurance within federated systems. By scrutinizing
the perspectives of Kantara, eIDAS, and REFEDS, this analysis elucidates the similarities, distinctions,
strengths, and limitations of each framework in tackling identity assurance challenges.
Furthermore, this study explores the implications for future research and development in federated identity
management, providing higher security of the electronic identities of users of federated systems. By fostering
a deeper understanding of identity assurance frameworks, this comparative analysis contributes to the
advancement of secure and trusted digital interactions in various organizational systems.
Subjects
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
revista - 2024-319-325.pdf
Size
447.03 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):b4b2894bc71c3e0a9a496f0b0b809321