WHETHER TO PUNISH OR TO FORGET: THE ETERNAL DILEMMA OF TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE?
Date Issued
2021-10
Author(s)
Abstract
The development of the concept of transitional justice has been one of
the most dramatic events in the legal and political science theory. It is hard to find
another concept or theory in legal and political science theory, that has managed to
develop at such a pace as the concept of transitional justice. In less than 60 years,
the concept of transitional justice has grown from an exception to a rule. However,
despite such a dramatic development, the rise of the concept of transitional justice
has been followed by a great number of dilemmas. Thus, regarding the concept of
transitional justice, it is often emphasized that it is a retroactive justice and that it
has the capacity to destabilize fragile post-conflict and post-repressive societies.
Additionally, unrealistic expectations for justice, the possibility of misuse for
revenge, as well as the need to address other issues (economic, infrastructural,
social, etc.) are usually highlighted as dilemmas regarding the implementation of
transitional justice. Such dilemmas have marked the development of transitional
justice during the XX century, but the intensive application of this concept has
brought in theory the statement that the implementation of transitional justice in
post-conflict and post-repressive societies contributes to the establishment of a
democratic society. A contribution like this is emphasized because the
implementation of transitional justice in post-conflict and post-repressive societies
contributes to non-repetition of crimes committed in the past, protection of the
system from undemocratic forces, building a democratic political culture and
positive economic results. In this regard, in theory is generally accepted that
transition societies, which choose to ignore the need to face their problematic past,
have a problem putting peace, stability, the rule of law and democracy on a solid
grounds.
the most dramatic events in the legal and political science theory. It is hard to find
another concept or theory in legal and political science theory, that has managed to
develop at such a pace as the concept of transitional justice. In less than 60 years,
the concept of transitional justice has grown from an exception to a rule. However,
despite such a dramatic development, the rise of the concept of transitional justice
has been followed by a great number of dilemmas. Thus, regarding the concept of
transitional justice, it is often emphasized that it is a retroactive justice and that it
has the capacity to destabilize fragile post-conflict and post-repressive societies.
Additionally, unrealistic expectations for justice, the possibility of misuse for
revenge, as well as the need to address other issues (economic, infrastructural,
social, etc.) are usually highlighted as dilemmas regarding the implementation of
transitional justice. Such dilemmas have marked the development of transitional
justice during the XX century, but the intensive application of this concept has
brought in theory the statement that the implementation of transitional justice in
post-conflict and post-repressive societies contributes to the establishment of a
democratic society. A contribution like this is emphasized because the
implementation of transitional justice in post-conflict and post-repressive societies
contributes to non-repetition of crimes committed in the past, protection of the
system from undemocratic forces, building a democratic political culture and
positive economic results. In this regard, in theory is generally accepted that
transition societies, which choose to ignore the need to face their problematic past,
have a problem putting peace, stability, the rule of law and democracy on a solid
grounds.
Subjects
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
9. Iuridica Prima - Book of abstracts 2021.pdf
Size
6.48 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):b0b0df60b04b55a8e8c8717f8ef68e90