Оптимизмот на Човекот и песимизмот на Натчовекот: Критичко испитување на трансхуманизмот во философската перспектива на Св. Максим Исповедник
Journal
Context, Institute for Macedonian Literature, Skopje
Date Issued
2020
Author(s)
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to create some philosophical synchronous machine.
Philosophy needs to play with contexts, times, and vocabularies in order to generate
new possibilities for the discourse. The basic philosophical stipulations of the transhumanism
were put into a discussion with the ideas of one Christian philosopher of
the late 6th and early 7th century just to clarify that the trans-humanism, in its
philosophical explication, has no serious philosophical substance. Furthermore, the
concepts of St. Maximus can enhance the philosophical clarity and logical nuances of
the trans-humanism. St. Maximus uses the conceptual triad to explain the relation
within the Triadology: Logos of the essence, Tropos of the being and Hypostasis of
the existence. Moreover, he also maintains that the dynamism of the world’s ontology
is shaped by Logoi of the world. Every logos has its own tropos, and hence, it has
infinite possibilities for hypostases that confirm the tropic factuality and efficiency of
the logos. Nietzsche and the trans-humanists overlook the difference between the
Logos and Hypostasis, and they misconceive the concepts of the ontological and the
ontic level of the reality. Trans-humanism is possible only on the level of hypostasis
due to the very dynamical tropos of the human logos. Hence, trans-humanism is
logically consistent not as trans-essential but as trans-hypostatical, and from this point
of view, the concept of Overhuman is just an artistic metaphor.
Philosophy needs to play with contexts, times, and vocabularies in order to generate
new possibilities for the discourse. The basic philosophical stipulations of the transhumanism
were put into a discussion with the ideas of one Christian philosopher of
the late 6th and early 7th century just to clarify that the trans-humanism, in its
philosophical explication, has no serious philosophical substance. Furthermore, the
concepts of St. Maximus can enhance the philosophical clarity and logical nuances of
the trans-humanism. St. Maximus uses the conceptual triad to explain the relation
within the Triadology: Logos of the essence, Tropos of the being and Hypostasis of
the existence. Moreover, he also maintains that the dynamism of the world’s ontology
is shaped by Logoi of the world. Every logos has its own tropos, and hence, it has
infinite possibilities for hypostases that confirm the tropic factuality and efficiency of
the logos. Nietzsche and the trans-humanists overlook the difference between the
Logos and Hypostasis, and they misconceive the concepts of the ontological and the
ontic level of the reality. Trans-humanism is possible only on the level of hypostasis
due to the very dynamical tropos of the human logos. Hence, trans-humanism is
logically consistent not as trans-essential but as trans-hypostatical, and from this point
of view, the concept of Overhuman is just an artistic metaphor.
Subjects
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
Солунчев, Ристо. 2020. Критичко испитување на трансхуманизмот во философската перспектива на св. Максим исповедник.pdf
Size
600.33 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):2e9db9a771830b5beb294466b6645e9b