Kalpak, Oliver
Preferred name
Kalpak, Oliver
Official Name
Kalpak, Oliver
Main Affiliation
46 results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 46
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Radial artery anomalies in the Macedonian population during transradial angiography procedures(Association of Medical Doctors "Sanamed" Novi Pazar, 2016); ;Petkoska, Danica ;Antov, Slobodan ;Vasilev, IvanJovkovski, Aleksandar - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Development and external validation of a post-discharge bleeding risk score in patients with acute coronary syndrome: The BleeMACS score(Elsevier BV, 2018-03-01) ;Raposeiras-Roubín, Sergio ;Faxén, Jonas ;Íñiguez-Romo, Andrés ;Henriques, Jose Paulo SimaoD'Ascenzo, FabrizioAccurate 1-year bleeding risk estimation after hospital discharge for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) may help clinicians guide the type and duration of antithrombotic therapy. Currently there are no predictive models for this purpose. The aim of this study was to derive and validate a simple clinical tool for bedside risk estimation of 1-year post-discharge serious bleeding in ACS patients. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Gender-related differences in post-discharge bleeding among patients with acute coronary syndrome on dual antiplatelet therapy: A BleeMACS sub-study(Elsevier BV, 2018-08) ;Grodecki, Kajetan ;Huczek, Zenon ;Scisło, Piotr ;Kowara, MichałRaposeiras-Roubín, SergioBleeding is an independent risk factor of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). BleeMACS project focuses on long-term bleeding events after hospital discharge, thus we evaluated gender-related differences in post-discharge bleeding among patients with ACS. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Complete transitioning to the radial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a real-world single-center registry of 1808 consecutive patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction(2014-09); ; ;Dharma, Surya ;Antov, SlobodanTo compare the short- and long-term outcomes of transradial approach (TRA) versus transfemoral approach (TFA) for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) during a complete institutional transition from TFA to TRA. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Prior Stroke/Transient Ischemic Attack and Acute Coronary Syndromes(SAGE Publications, 2020) ;Zhang, Dongfeng ;Song, Xiantao ;Chen, Yalei ;Raposeiras-Roubín, SergioAbu-Assi, Emad - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The prevalence and outcomes of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome. Analysis from the single-centre ISACS-TC Registry (International Survey of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Transitional Countries) (2010-12)(Oxford University Press (OUP), 2014-01-01); ; ;Antov, Slobodan; The aims were to compare the prevalence and short-term outcomes of transradial (TRA) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in dedicated radial centre. This was a single-centre observational study of 3484 consecutively enrolled patients with ACS in a 3-year period (2010–12). There were 1648 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 1836 with non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTEACS). All patients underwent diagnostic coronary angiography within 24 h (STEMI) or within 72 h (NSTEACS). Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 84.9% patients (96.6% with STEMI and 74.9% with NSTEACS). Optimal medical treatment (OMT) only was recommended to 2.2% with STEMI and to 11.1% with NSTEACS. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery was performed for 1.7% of STEMI and 14.1% of patients with NSTEACS (P < 0.0001). Most of the PCI procedures were performed through the wrist access (radial 97% and ulnar artery access 1.3%). There was high overall procedural success 98.5% (STEMI 99% and NSTEACS 97%). At 30 days, cardiovascular mortality was 4.7% in STEMI patients and 1.4% in patients with NSTEACS who were treated by PCI (P < 0.0001). Major adverse cardiac events defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and non-CABG major bleeding and major access site complications at 30 days were higher in STEMI vs. NSTEACS patients (7.7 vs. 4.4%; P < 0.0001). Transradial access for PCI in a large cohort of unselected patients with ACS, is safe and feasible when performed by experienced radial operators. Patients with NSTEACS are more frequently treated with OMT and have higher referral rate to CABG in comparison with STEMI patients. There is higher 30 day mortality in patients with STEMI. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The impact of optimal medical therapy on patients with recurrent acute myocardial infarction: Subanalysis from the BleeMACS study(Elsevier BV, 2020-11-01) ;Zhang, Dongfeng ;Song, Xiantao ;Raposeiras-Roubín, Sergio ;Abu-Assi, EmadHenriques, Jose Paulo SimaoAcute myocardial infarction (AMI) recurrence is still high despite great progress in secondary prevention. Patients with recurrent AMI suffer worse prognosis compared to those with first AMI. The objective was to evaluate the effect of optimal medical therapy (OMT) on these patients with recurrent AMI. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Complete or incomplete coronary revascularisation in patients with myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a propensity score analysis from the “real-life” BleeMACS (Bleeding complications in a Multicenter registry of patients discharged with diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome) registry(Europa Digital & Publishing, 2017-07) ;Quadri, Giorgio ;D’Ascenzo, Fabrizio ;Moretti, Claudio ;D’Amico, MaurizioRaposeiras-Roubín, SergioAims: The benefit of complete or incomplete percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with myocardial infarction and multivessel disease remains debated. The aim of our study was to compare a complete vs. a “culprit only” revascularisation strategy in patients with myocardial infarction distinguishing the different clinical subsets (STEMI and NSTEMI) and to provide one-year clinical outcome from the “real-life” BleeMACS (Bleeding complications in a Multicenter registry of patients discharged with diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome) registry. Methods and results: We conducted a multicentre study including all patients with myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary disease included in the BleeMACS (Bleeding complications in a Multicenter registry of patients discharged with diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome) registry. They were divided into two groups, complete revascularisation (CR) and incomplete revascularisation (IR). The primary endpoint was the death rate at one-year follow-up. Secondary endpoints were in-hospital repeat myocardial infarction (re-AMI), in-hospital heart failure (HF), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and myocardial infarction at one year. Four thousand five hundred and twenty patients were included in our analysis, with a diagnosis of STEMI in 67.7% and NSTEMI in 32.3%. CR was performed in 27.2% and 42.4%, respectively. At univariate analysis, in-hospital and one-year outcomes were similar between CR and IR in STEMI patients (all p-values >0.05). In NSTEMI patients, CR was associated with a lower one-year death rate (4.5% vs. 8.5%; p=0.002), re-AMI (3.7% vs. 6.6%; p=0.016) and MACE (8.1% vs. 13.9%; p=0.001). After propensity score matching, CR also reduced events in STEMI patients, including one-year mortality (5.3% vs. 13.8%; p<0.001), re-AMI (4.9% vs. 17.4%; p<0.001) and MACE (8.5% vs. 24.6%; p<0.001). Conclusions: This multicentre retrospective registry showed the benefit of CR in terms of reduction of one-year mortality in patients with myocardial reinfarction and multivessel coronary disease. Randomised controlled trials including functional evaluation of the lesions should be performed to confirm our results. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Acute Coronary Syndrome: The Risk to Young Women(Wiley-Blackwell, 2017-12-22) ;Ricci, Beatrice ;Cenko, Edina ;Vasiljevic, Zorana ;Stankovic, GoranBackground Although acute coronary syndrome (ACS) mainly occurs in patients >50 years, younger patients can be affected as well. We used an age cutoff of 45 years to investigate clinical characteristics and outcomes of “young” patients with ACS. Methods and Results Between October 2010 and April 2016, 14 931 patients with ACS were enrolled in the ISACS‐TC (International Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Transitional Countries) registry. Of these patients, 1182 (8%) were aged ≤45 years (mean age, 40.3 years; 15.8% were women). The primary end point was 30‐day all‐cause mortality. Percentage diameter stenosis of ≤50% was defined as insignificant coronary disease. ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction was the most common clinical manifestation of ACS in the young cases (68% versus 59.6%). Young patients had a higher incidence of insignificant coronary artery disease (11.4% versus 10.1%) and lesser extent of significant disease (single vessel, 62.7% versus 46.6%). The incidence of 30‐day death was 1.3% versus 6.9% for the young and older patients, respectively. After correction for baseline and clinical differences, age ≤45 years was a predictor of survival in men (odds ratio, 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.10–0.58), but not in women (odds ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.50–3.62). This pattern of reversed risk among sexes held true after multivariable correction for in‐hospital medications and reperfusion therapy. Moreover, younger women had worse outcomes than men of a similar age (odds ratio, 6.03; 95% confidence interval, 2.07–17.53). Conclusion ACS at a young age is characterized by less severe coronary disease and high prevalence of ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction. Women have higher mortality than men. Young age is an independent predictor of lower 30‐day mortality in men, but not in women. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Macedonia: coronary and structural heart interventions from 2010 to 2015(European Association of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions, 2017-05-15); ; ; ;Slobodan AntovThe aim of this report is to describe invasive cardiology procedural practice in Macedonia during the period from 2010 to 2015. Details of all consecutive 39,899 patients who underwent cardiovascular, peripheral or structural heart procedures during the period from 2010 until 2015 were examined. Clinical and procedure characteristics, access site, procedural success and complications were analysed. The number of coronary angiographies increased from 5,540 in 2010 to 8,550 in 2015. Transfemoral access (TFA) was present in 4% of coronary angiographies in 2010 and had decreased to 1% in 2015. The number of primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction increased from 763 to 1,175 and both chronic total occlusion and left main coronary artery interventions also increased over time. In 2015, the drug-eluting stent penetration rate was 65%. Structural heart interventions, including transcatheter aortic valve implantations (TAVI) were introduced in 2014 and 23 TAVI cases have since been performed. Transradial access was performed in 38,455 (96%) of all patients. Wrist access adoption in the majority of cardiovascular interventions is possible in all PCI centres in Europe if an appropriate national strategy is developed.
