Faculty of Philosophy
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://repository.ukim.mk/handle/20.500.12188/18
Browse
132 results
Search Results
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The Use of Focus Groups in Social Research: Methodological Issues(ISRES Publishing, 2025); Galevska, Elena - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The Western Balkans in the Multipolar Puzzle: Navigating Between the West and the Global Majority(Bomat Graphics, Skopje, 2025-03) - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Forgotten Voices: Aromanians in Macedonia (1900-1941)(Institute for Recent History of Serbia, 2024)This study examines the demographic and cultural transformations of the Aromanian population in Macedonia from the early 20th century through the interwar period. It explores how the Aromanians navigated their complex identity amidst the pressures of Greek and Romanian influence while adapting to the changing political landscape. The research also assesses the impact of the Balkan Wars and World War I on their community. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Bioethical Aspects of the Question of “Good” Death (Euthanasia) in Contemporary World(Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2014)Every human being has the right to live and it is a fundamental human right - the right of life. But in today's modern society, the question of right of dignity in dying and death and the right to a painless death, is also inevitable. In this context, there are attempts of legal regulation of euthanasia! However, if painless death in the same time means also a murder, we should rejected it. Moreover, because we have another possible and even more an ethical alternative - palliative medicine, or care, because it protects human dignity, which the use of euthanasia negates it! Thus, palliative medicine that promotes the culture of life at its end and connects the highest quality medical advances and the compassionate care for patients and their families with emotional and spiritual support - significantly reduces the demand for euthanasia, and makes it redundant. This as a possibility, but what is actually the practice and the situation in contemporary life pervaded with the maxim "Carpe diem!"? How modern man which accepts that life is worth living only under the aspect of quality of life as defined by criteria of living standards, benefits, happiness, mobility, painlessness, absence of suffering …, understands euthanasia? Hence, the text deals with the different definition of euthanasia and palliative care through the prism of bioethics and its key issues - human dignity. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Милет системот, националната флуктуација и војната со бројки за Османлиска Македонија(Здружение за унапредување на одржлив развој Институт Балкан про Европа-Скопје, 2024) - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Multisectoral Collaboration in the Delivery of Social Services in the FYRoM(Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2014); - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Between Ego(centr)ism and Cooperation: Would People Become Moraly Diseangaged or More Altruistic After the Covid-19 Pandemic?(LIT Verlag GmbH & Co.KG Wien, 2020); The world is facing great health challenge since COVID-19 pandemic was declared. How- ever, it is not only immense health issue, but also psychological, bioethical, economical, and political one. There are many unanswered questions. Among them is how this pandemic will affect people’s mental health and their moral behavior? In this paper, the authors are focusing on the dilemma whether people will become more morally disengaged, or more altruistic after the pandemic is over. Hence, the knowledge from ethics and psychology is integrated, having in mind that people have potential for being both good and bad in their actions towards others. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Animal (Bio)ethics – A Philosophical Background(Ethics International Press Ltd. UK, 2022)Today, we are still dealing with the unresolved question about the relationship between humans and animals, which belong to distinctly and significantly different ontological stages. Can this ontological differentiation, which imposes certain insurmountable limits of argumentation in favour of a behaviour, guided by moral rules, concerning animals and the very thought of their rights in general, be considered sufficient? Or, in the modern ethical discussion, we should require an adaptive reorientation of the argument, if it refers to the normative regulation of our behaviour towards animals? Is it possible to create and apply animal bioethics? - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication,