Iustinianus Primus Faculty of Law
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://repository.ukim.mk/handle/20.500.12188/22
Browse
13 results
Search Results
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, HUMAN RIGHTS AND ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW, RIGHT OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE, NORTH MACEDONIA(SEE Law Journal, 2022)Rakočević, MilkaIn the context of ensuring the principles of equality and non-discrimination every democratic state has the obligation to standardize the corpus of rules that will regulate the anti-discrimination matter precisely and comprehensively in order to create solid mechanisms for efficient and effective legal protection against discrimination. In case of discrimination, besides the possibility of effectuation of extra-judicial mechanisms for protection against discrimination, the victim of discrimination under the law has the right to protect its right in court proceedings. The subject matter of this article is the civil court protection from discrimination in the Republic of North Macedonia. Analysis of the subject matter includes a number of important issues in relation to the judicial protection in the case of improper discrimination. Mainly, the paper deals with the characteristics of individual anti-discrimination judicial protection. The author sets special focus on the procedural specifics that characterize this type of court proceedings. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, SPECIALIZATION OF JURISDICTION BACK FROM OBLIVION – A NEW ATTENTIVE AND ASSIDOUS APPROACH TO COMPLEX CROSS BORDER FAMILY LAW CASES OR POSSIBLE REVITALIZATION OF ‘MUTUAL TRUST’(Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, 2021) ;Rakočević, MilkaNew trend emerges in the quest for establishing real actual trust between the main stakeholders in the complex cross border family law cases, which is providing for concentration of jurisdiction. The Hague Conference of Private International Law (HCCH) and the European Union (EU) are in forefront of establishing concentrating jurisdiction for those proceedings based on limitation of the number of courts in order to solve two problems: to enhance the predictability and the uniformity of the outcomes in these cases and to re-establish the mutual trust on realistic grounds instead of its current notion as a political decision. Such strategy is welcomed since it starts from the bottom and it tends to elevate the trust between the persons concerned in these proceedings and with that it stretches its prerogatives to the top, which is to enhance the trust between the legal systems. Whether it will succeed it depends again on the modalities of its establishment in the national legal systems. Generally, specialization of jurisdiction is frequently considered to be an important reform initiative in improving the development of a successful judicial system which is why it is recognized as a rapidly growing trend regarding the organization of the judiciary systems worldwide. The article will discuss the concepts of specialization of jurisdiction and its possible implementation in the national legal system of Republic of North Macedonia (N. Macedonia) regarding the complex cross border family law cases. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, THE SYSTEM OF FREE LEGAL AID IN THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA: CURRENT SITUATION AND CHALLENGES(Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Splitu, R. Hrvatska, 2022) ;Zoroska Kamilovska, Tatjana ;Rakočević, MilkaMicevska, TeaIn order to fully enjoy the right to access to justice, it is not sufficient for the state to establish an effective system of legal protection, but to provide a system where, without discrimination of any kind, every person will be able to enjoy its right to access to justice regardless of the obstacles, typically of financial nature, one can confront in realization and protection of its rights. Such system is needed in order for the human rights to be protected and enforced equally. The right to legal aid is considered as an essential element of a fair, human and efficient system of administration of justice. The paper discusses certain aspects of the right to free legal aid in international and national context. After analyzing the essence and concept of legal aid generally, the authors refer to the European standards relating to legal aid focusing on the legal instruments and measures adopted by CoE and EU and the case-law of the ECtHR in that regard. Furthermore, the current normative framework of North Macedonia concerning free legal aid in civil cases is being discussed including an analysis of the practical implementation of the Law on Free Legal Aid from 2019 and the challenges that occurred from its application in the practice. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, POSTUPANJE OVRŠITELJA SA POKRETNINAMA KOJE SE NALAZE NA NEKOPOKRETNOSTI NA KOJOJ JE IZVRŠENA PRODAJA RADI NAPLATE NOVČANE TRAŽBINE(Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Splitu, R. Hrvatska, 2023)Rakočević, MilkaKada je riječ o postupanju sa pokretninama i njihovoj prodaji u ovršnom postupku, to pitanje najčešće razmatramo u okviru postupanja ovršitelja kod ostvarenja novčane tražbine i to kao sredstvo ovrhe (ovrha na pokretninama) ili u okviru ovrhe radi ostvarenja nenovčane tražbine ispražnjenja i predaje nepokretnosti. Predmet interesovanja ovog rada je postupanje ovršitelja sa pokretninama u onim slučajevima kada se ovrha radi ispražnjenja i predaje nepokretnosti sprovodi kao adhezijski postupak u postupku ovrhe na nekretninama radi ostvarenja novčane tražbine. Povod za razmatranje ovog pitanja su određene dileme i problemi sa kojima se suočavaju ovršitelji u njihovom radu postupajući u ovakvim slučajevima. Prije svega dileme i problemi proizlaze iz zakonskih odredbi koje reguliraju ovu materiju budući da zakon ne uređuje u potpunosti sva pitanja koja se mogu aktuelizirati u ovom adhezijskom postupku. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, OBAVEZNI POKUŠAJ MEDIJACIJE U PARNIČNOM POSTUPKU SJEVERNE MAKEDONIJE(Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Splitu, R. Hrvatska, 2021) ;Rakočević, MilkaZoroska Kamilovska, TatjanaPromocija i poticanje medijacije u Republici Sjevernoj Makedoniji ide sporo i sa skromnim rezultatima. Od donošenja prvog Zakona o medijaciji 2006 godine do danas, neprestano se ulažu napori da se mirenje oživi na domaćoj pravnoj sceni. Na normativnom planu, model medijacije pretrpio je višestruke promjene i transformacije. Izmjenama i dopunama Zakona o parničnom postupku iz 2015 godine kao perspektivno rješenje uveden je obavezni pokušaj medijacije u trgovačkim sporovima do 1.000.000 denara. Razlozi ovog zakonodavnog poduhvata u javnosti bili su oskudno obrazloženi. Nepostojanje specifičnih pokazatelja za potrebu uvođenja obaveznog pokušaja medijacije u ovoj vrsti sporova mobiliziralo je otpor mnogih trgovinskih subjekata, ali i članova pravne struke. Mali broj komparativnih primjera i iskustava iz zemalja Europske unije, posebno turbulencije u održavanju ovog modela u nekima od njih, kao i početni organizacijski problemi njegove primjene u našoj zemlji, potaknuli su sumnje u perspektivu ovog rješenja. Čini se da je nekoliko godina nakon uvođenja obveznog pokušaja medijacije u trgovačkim sporovima do određene vrijednosti sasvim solidno vrijeme za procjenu dosadašnjeg uspjeha ovog rješenja, ali i za prognozu dali takvo rješenje ima dugoročnih izgleda oživjeti medijaciju u našoj zemlji i stvoriti kulturu korištenja medijacije čak i kada ona nije nametnuta, tj. na čisto dobrovoljnoj osnovi. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, OBTAINING AN ENFORCEABLE TITLE FOR UNCONTESTED MONETARY CLAIMS: PARALLELS BETWEEN MACEDONIAN AND SPANISH LAW(IBEROJUR, 2020)Rakočević, MilkaThe paper discusses the legislative framework of Macedonia and Spain regarding the available procedural mechanisms for obtaining an enforceable title for uncontested monetary claims. Similarities and differences of the procedural systems are observed, as well as their results. The comparison of procedural mechanisms of both countries highlights the conceptual diversity, but also proximity of two countries, especially in the light of their affinity to different procedural circles within the continental Europe. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, ЉУДСКА ПРАВА И АНТИДИСКРИМИНАЦИОНО ПРАВО, ПРАВО НА ПРИСТУП ПРАВОСУЂУ, СЕВЕРНА МАКЕДОНИЈА, НАЦИОНАЛНИ ИЗВЕШТАЈ(2022)Rakočević, MilkaУ контексту обезбеђења принципа једнакости и недискриминације свака демократска држава има обавезу да нормира корпус правила који ће на прецизан и свеобухватан начин уредити антидискриминациону материју како би се створили солидни механизми за ефикасну и ефективну правну заштиту од дискриминације. У случају недопуштене дискриминације, поред могућности ефектуирања вансудских механизама за заштиту од дискриминације, жртва дискриминације по сили закона има право да заштиту свог угроженог, оспореног или поврећеног права оствари у поступку пред судом. Предмет интересовања овог рада је судска грађанскоправна заштита од дискриминације у праву Републике Северне Македоније. Анализа предметне проблематике обухвата низ значајних питања у односу на остваривање судске заштите у случају недопуштене дискриминације. У највећем делу рад се бави са карактеристикама индивидуалне антидискриминационе судске заштите. Аутори посебну пажњу посвећују процесним специфичностима које су карактеристичне за ову врсту поступка. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, BONA FIDES IN ROMAN CIVIL PROCEDURE(Ius Romanum, Periodicum Digitale, 2021)Rakočević, MilkaAlthough not always distinguished as an explicit procedural phenomenon, abusus iuris doctrine has a long history and is familiar to all periods of historical development of civil procedure. As one of the basic principles of contemporary civil procedure, if analysed historically, it can be noted that the prohibition of abuse of procedural rights is neither modern nor contemporary in the legal meaning of those terms, nor in the historical retrospective loses the importance that characterize it in the modern civil procedure. Within the paper, the focus is set on the administration of justice in ancient Rome with particular interest on the institute of abuse of procedural rights. The paper discusses the beginnings and development of organized methods of legal protection in Roman civil procedure with the aim to determine its basic characteristic through different stages of its development and to analyse the frivolous behaviour of the parties before the tribunal and procedural mechanisms for supressing vexatious litigation. The historical retrospective is covering different periods of development of the Roman litigation. The main drive for analysis of the historical dimension of civil procedure in ancient Rome is to analyse the genesis and evolution of the principle of bona fides in Roman civil procedure - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, ДОЛЖНОСТ ЗА ЗБОРУВАЊЕ НА ВИСТИНАТА ВО ПАРНИЧНАТА ПОСТАПКА(Правен Факултет „Јустинијан Први“ во Скопје, 2021)Rakočević, MilkaProcedural powers are not only provided by the law so that the sought legal protection could be provided to the litigants who addressed the court for adjudication in certain legal case, but also for the reason of protecting the legal order. Having in mind the social function that is carried out through the civil procedure, the litigants are obliged to act and behave loyally within the court system of legal protection and to use their procedural right conscientiously. Taking in consideration the broad concept of conscientious use of procedural right and powers, three types of duties are set in front of the litigants: 1) conscientious use of procedural rights, 2) the duty to tell the truth and 3) not to abuse their procedural rights. The subject matter of this article is the duty of telling the truth in civil procedure. The article is focused on analyzing certain questions that are related to the essence of this procedural duty and legal responsibility, taken in broaden context. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, PRIGOVOR O NEZAKONITOSTIMA U POSTUPKU OVRHE [OBJECTION AGAINST IRREGULARITIES IN ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE](Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Splitu, R. Hrvatska, 2020) ;Zoroska Kamilovska, TatjanaRakočević, MilkaUvođenjem privatnih ovršitelja kao zasebne pravne profesije u čijoj je isključivoj nadležnosti sprovođenje postupka prisilnog ostvarivanja tražbina od izuzetnog i prvorazrednog značaja postavilo se pitanje kontrole u odnosu na zakonitost njihovog rada. Prema Zakonu o ovrsi, više subjekata ima ovlast kontrolirati zakonito postupanje ovršitelja u provedbi ovrhe i vršiti nadzor nad radom ovršiteljske službe. Od ponuđenih kontrolnih mehanizama, sa aspekta zakonitog i pravilnog postupanja ovršitelja tijekom samog postupka ovrhe najznačajnija je kontrola koju obavlja sud, jer ista ima kapacitet da obesnaži nezakonite i nepravilne radnje ovršitelja. Kao posebna vrsta nadzora, sudska kontrola rada ovršitelja ostvaruje se kroz mogućnost izjavljivanja prigovora o nezakonitostima tijekom ovrhe. U radu se nastoji obraditi pitanje sudske kontrole rada ovršitelja koja se ostvaruje kroz mogućnost izjavljivanja prigovora o nezakonitostima tijekom ovrhe, kao specifičnog i jedinstvenog pravnog sredstva u postupku ovrhe. Nakon uvodnih razmatranja, središnji i opsegom najveći dio rada posvjećen je analizi pojma i temeljnih osobina prigovora o nezakonitostima tijekom ovrhe i objekta pobijanja ovog pravnog sredstva. U radu se takođe obrađuju i specifičnosti postupka po prigovoru.
