Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/8267
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGjorgjina Cenikjen_US
dc.contributor.authorDushica Jankovikjen_US
dc.contributor.authorOliver Dimitrioven_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-22T07:57:22Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-22T07:57:22Z-
dc.date.issued2020-05-08-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/8267-
dc.description.abstractThe escalation of flexibility, scalability, and elasticity demands for data storage solutions has implored the quest of finding an alternative to the traditional relational databases, which in turn, lead to the popularization of NoSQL databases. This paper takes a deeper look into the key-value stores, and accentuates their strengths and weaknesses. The performance of Redis, LevelDB, and Oracle NoSQL is compared to that of the PostgreSQL database. The results affirm the inability of key-value stores to achieve comparable performance on queries that are typically performed on relational databases, such as inserting and deleting records, sorting and querying that involves several join operations. The results indicate that LevelDB outperforms Redis and Oracle NoSQL in most scenarios. The evaluation of the modeling capabilities of each database reveals additional challenges that one needs to be aware of when choosing which key-value store is best suited for their requirements.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSs. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Republic of North Macedoniaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCIIT 2020 full papers;28-
dc.subjectNoSQL databases, key-value, Redis, LevelDB, Oracleen_US
dc.titleThe challenges of key-value storesen_US
dc.typeProceeding articleen_US
dc.relation.conference17th International Conference on Informatics and Information Technologies - CIIT 2020en_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:International Conference on Informatics and Information Technologies
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
CIIT2020_paper_28.pdf367.69 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

338
checked on Apr 28, 2024

Download(s)

146
checked on Apr 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.