Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/8084
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSerafimov, Markoen_US
dc.contributor.authorMojsovski, Filipen_US
dc.contributor.authorShesho, Igoren_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-10T20:59:59Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-10T20:59:59Z-
dc.date.issued2017-10-
dc.identifier.isbn978-86-6055-098-1-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/8084-
dc.description.abstractIn according to Directive 2010/31/EU, the concept of Cost-Optimality was setting the energy performance requirements in the MS building codes. Particularly, the Commission established a comparative framework methodology for calculating cost-optimal levels of minimum energy performance for building. The same Directive also introduces the concept of nearly Zero-Energy Buildings (nZEB) stating that all new buildings by the end of 2020 must be nZEB. The cost-optimal methodology helps to understand and manage the implications of implementing requirements for nZEB.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Mechanical Engineering in Nisen_US
dc.subjectcost-optimal levels, comparative framework methodology, Directive 2010/31/EU (EPBD recast), EED Directive 2012/27/EU, nearly Zero-Energy Buildingsen_US
dc.titleConvergence Between Cost-Optimality and Nearly Zero-Energy Buildingsen_US
dc.typeProceeding articleen_US
dc.relation.conference18th Symposium on Thermal Science and Engineering of Serbia, SIMTERM 2017en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Mechanical Engineering-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Mechanical Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Mechanical Engineering: Conference papers
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

59
checked on May 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.