Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/7929
Title: The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice and the National (Constitutional) Courts and the Concepts of Sovereignty in the European Union: In or out of the shade of the Westphalian Paradigm?
Other Titles: New Perspectives of South East European Public Law
Authors: Ristova - Aasterud, Karolina
Keywords: Courts, EU, jurisprudence, soverignty.
Issue Date: Jun-2014
Publisher: Center for South East European Law School Network
Series/Report no.: pp. 77-83;
Conference: SEE Post-doc Colloquium in Public Law, 10-11 April, 2014, Tirana, Albania
Abstract: The book chapter analyzes the jurisprudence of the ECJ and the national (constitutional) courts regarding the issue of sovereignty in the EU, with a particular view on how that jurisprudence influences the understanding of the EU polity. It is argued that the jurisprudence of both ECJ and the national (constitutional) courts are decisively shaped by the so-called Westphalian paradigm on sovereignty. Although this paradigm serves as a common judicial denominator, it does not necessarily lead to an identical understanding of the sovereignty in the EU by both levels of courts, thus leading to different conceptualizations of the nature of the EU polity.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/7929
ISBN: 978-608-4697-07-7
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Law: Journal Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

85
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s)

136
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.