Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/26619
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPivkova Veljanovska, Aleksandraen_US
dc.contributor.authorStojanoski, Zlateen_US
dc.contributor.authorCevreska, Lidijaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSiljanoski, Nikolaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKaranfilski, Oliveren_US
dc.contributor.authorGenadieva stavrikj, Sonjaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPanovska Stavridis, Irinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKrstevska balkanov, Svetlanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorTrajkova, Sanjaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGeorgievski, Borcheen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-29T12:27:01Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-29T12:27:01Z-
dc.date.issued2005-06-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/26619-
dc.description.abstractNeutropenia after high -dose VP-16 plus G-CSF, as mobilization chemotherapy regimen prior autologous setting in patients with hematological malignancies, is common finding, although infectious complications have not been previously described. In the attempt to reduce infective complications and the higher incidence of hospitalization for neutropenic, fever prophylactic antibiotic regimen was administered for patients receiving this regimen. We evaluated 35 patients with lympho-proliferative ma 19nancies (NHL13, HO 6, MM 12, and ALL 4) treated with HOT/ASCT at Department of hematology, Skopje, Macedonia. The patients were mobilized with VP-1 6 (2 grim') and G-CSF 10mcg/kg starting from day 5 of chemotherapy. regimen. The regimen was effective in the progenitor cell mobilization and almost 84% of analyzed patients reached at least2xlO (6)/kg C034+ cells with median 3 (ranges 1-6) apheresis procedures. Only two patients with HD and one AML failed mobilization. The patients were divided in two groups: 1) no specific antibiotic prophylaxis (n=7); (2) vancomycin Lv., cefixime p.o, (n=13); (3) amoxicillin clavulanic acid and ciprofloxacin p.o. (n= 15), The first group of patients revealed higher incidence of need for hospitalization (67%) due to neutropenic fever, versus second (28%) and third group (15%) of patients respectively (p<0,001 between the first and the other two groups). At the end we conclude that VP-16+G-CSF mobilization schedule revealed Significant high incidence of neutropenic fever that can be substantially reduced by a vigorous antimicrobial prophylactic program.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofHaematologicaen_US
dc.titlePREVENTION OF HEUTROPENIC FEVER DURING ADMINISTRATIOH OF HIGH DOSE VP-16 PLUS G-CSF FOR MOBIUZATION OF PBSC-THE EFACIENCY OF PROPHYLACTIC AHTlBIOTIC TREATMENTen_US
dc.typeProceeding articleen_US
dc.relation.conference10th Congress of the European Hematology Association Stockholm, Sweden, June 2-5, 2005en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Conference papers
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

31
checked on May 29, 2024

Download(s)

11
checked on May 29, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.