Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/16659
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKocarev, Ljupcoen_US
dc.contributor.authorKoteska, Jasnaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-22T09:47:23Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-22T09:47:23Z-
dc.date.issued2022-01-21-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/16659-
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT: This paper addresses ontology and ethics of an AI agent called digital me. We define digital me as an autonomous, decision-making, and learning agent, representing an individual and having practically immortal life. It is assumed that digital me is equipped with the big-five personality model, ensuring that it provides a model of some aspects of a strong AI: consciousness, free will, and intentionality. As computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans, digital me can judge the personality of the individual represented by the digital me, other individuals’ personalities, and other digital me-s. We describe seven ontological qualities of digital me: a) double-layer status of Digital Being versus digital me, b) digital me versus real me, c) mind-digital me and body-digital me, d) digital me versus doppelganger (shadow digital me), e) non-human time concept, f) social quality, g) practical immortality. We argue that with the advancement of AI’s sciences and technologies, there exist two digital me thresholds. The first threshold defines digital me having some (rudimentarily) form of consciousness, free will, and intentionality. The second threshold assumes that digital me is equipped with moral learning capabilities, implying that, in principle, digital me-s could develop their own ethics which significantly differs from human’s understanding of ethics. Finally we discuss the implications of digital me metaethics, normative and applied ethics, the implementation of the Golden Rule in digital me-s, and we suggest two sets of normative principles for digital me: consequentialist and duty based digital me principles.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherVIA University College in Aarhus, Denmarken_US
dc.relation.ispartofFutures of Education, Culture and Nature - Learning to Become (FECUN)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol.1;15-30-
dc.subjectDigital Meen_US
dc.subjectOntologyen_US
dc.subjectEthicsen_US
dc.subjectTo-limited-extend fully ethical agenten_US
dc.subjectNonhuman ethicsen_US
dc.subjectDigital me ethical principlesen_US
dc.titleDigital me Ontology and Ethicsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.conferenceFutures-21en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.7146/fecun.v1i.130229-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptBlaze Koneski" Faculty of Philology-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Philology: Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kocarev Koteska.pdf269.7 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

63
checked on May 20, 2024

Download(s)

8
checked on May 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.