Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/10300
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMartin-Olmedo, Piedaden_US
dc.contributor.authorRanzi, Andreaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSantoro, Micheleen_US
dc.contributor.authorDack, Sarahen_US
dc.contributor.authorde Hoogh, Keesen_US
dc.contributor.authorMartuzzi, Marcoen_US
dc.contributor.authorDogliotti, Eugeniaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHoek, Gerarden_US
dc.contributor.authorTomasova, Jelenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMirjana Dimovskaen_US
dc.contributor.authorIavarone, Ivanoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-25T12:43:49Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-25T12:43:49Z-
dc.date.issued2019-08-
dc.identifier.issn1120-9763-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/10300-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: human exposure to mixtures of chemicals of toxicological interest, typically found in industrial contaminated sites (ICSs), has been associated with a broad range of different health outcomes. Deprived population groups endure most of the burden of disease and premature death associated to the exposure to those pollutants. Characterizing the impacts on health of an ICS is a challenging process. Currently the two main methodological approaches used are Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) and Environmental Epidemiological (EE) studies. OBJECTIVES: review existing guidance and scientific evidence for HHRA and EE studies applied to contaminated sites that orientate in selecting the most suitable methodological approach for characterizing health impacts in ICSs according to the site characteristics, and the availability of environmental, health and sociodemographic data. RESULTS: HHRA has evolved into a more holistic approach, placing more emphasis in planning, community involvement and adapting the dimension of the assessment to the problem formulation and to the availability of resources. Many different HHRA guidelines for contaminated sites has been published worldwide, and although they share a similar framework, the scientific evidence used for deriving reference values and the variet of policy options can result in a wide variability of health risk estimates. This paper condenses different options with the recommendations to use those tools, default values for environmental and exposure levels and toxicological reference values that most suit to the population and characteristics of the ICSs under evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: the suitability to use one or another approach to assess the impact of ICSs on health depends on the availability of data, cost-benefit aspects and the kind of problem that needs to be answered. Risk assessment based on toxicological data can be very rapid and cheap, providing direct information when the intervention to protect the health of population is urgent and no suitable dose-response functions are available from epidemiological studies. Conducting EE studies provide a deeper insight into the problem of the exposure to industrial pollutants that do not require extrapolation from data obtained from toxicological studies or other population, addressing the community concern’s more directly. Complementing the results obtained from different approaches, including those from public health surveillance systems, might provide an efficient and complete response to the impact of ICSs.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis publication is based upon work from COST Action ICSHNet, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relationCOST Action ICSHNet, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology).en_US
dc.relation.ispartofEpidemiologia e prevenzioneen_US
dc.subjectindustrially contaminated sitesen_US
dc.subjecthuman health risk assessmenten_US
dc.subjectenvironmental epidemiologyen_US
dc.subjectexposure assessmenten_US
dc.subjectchemicalsen_US
dc.titleMethods and data needs to assess health impacts of chemicals in industrial contaminated sitesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.19191/EP19.4.A01.068-
dc.identifier.volume43-
dc.identifier.issue4-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
223_art1_epiprev.it.pdf207.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

96
checked on May 3, 2024

Download(s)

34
checked on May 3, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.