Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/9929
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorM. Carderen_US
dc.contributor.authorL. Bensefa-Colasen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Mattiolien_US
dc.contributor.authorP. Nooneen_US
dc.contributor.authorE. Stikovaen_US
dc.contributor.authorM. Valentyen_US
dc.contributor.authorM. Telle-Lambertonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-25T09:21:27Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-25T09:21:27Z-
dc.date.issued2015-10-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/9929-
dc.description.abstractBackground To improve occupational health public policies and to facilitate coordinated research within the European Union to reduce the incidence of occupational diseases (ODs), it is important to know what OD surveillance systems exist and how they compare. Monitoring trends in occupational diseases and tracing new and emerging risks in a network (Modernet) participants are well placed to provide this information as most either contribute data to and/or are involved in the management of OD systems. Aims To identify and describe OD surveillance systems in Modernet countries with the longer-term objective of identifying a core template to be used on a large scale. Methods A questionnaire sent to Modernet participants, seeking structured information about the OD surveillance system(s) in their country. Results Overall 14 countries (70%) provided information for 33 OD systems, among them 11 compensation-based (CB) systems. Six countries provided information for non-CB systems reporting for any type of OD. The other systems reported either only ODs from a prescribed list, or specific diagnoses or diagnostic groups, with reports to most schemes being physician-based. Data collected varied but all systems collected diagnosis, age, gender, date reported and occupation (and/or industry) and most collected information on exposure. Conclusions This review provides information beneficial to both policy makers and researchers by identifying data sources useable to measure OD trends in European countries and opening the way to future work, both on trend comparisons within Europe and on the definition of a core template to extend OD surveillance on a larger scaleen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford Academicen_US
dc.relationCOST-MODERNETen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOccupational Medicineen_US
dc.subjectepidemiological surveillanceen_US
dc.subjectEuropeen_US
dc.subjectModerneten_US
dc.subjectoccupational diseaseen_US
dc.titleA review of occupational disease surveillance systems in Modernet countriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/occmed/kqv081-
dc.identifier.volume65-
dc.identifier.issue8-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
A review of occupational disease surveillance.pdf404.16 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

48
checked on Jul 18, 2024

Download(s)

8
checked on Jul 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.