Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/7208
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPoposka, Lidijaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBoskov, Vladimiren_US
dc.contributor.authorRisteski, Dejanen_US
dc.contributor.authorJane Taleskien_US
dc.contributor.authorJanusevski, Filipen_US
dc.contributor.authorSrbinovska, Elizabetaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGeorgievska-Ismail, Ljubicaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-10T08:27:10Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-10T08:27:10Z-
dc.date.issued2018-02-15-
dc.identifier.issn1857-9655-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/7208-
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Although strict selection criteria are used to select patients for cardiac resynchronisation therapy, up to 30% of patients do not have a positive clinical response. PATIENTS: A total of 102 consecutive patients who had biventricular pacemaker/defibrillator (CRT-P or CRT-D) implanted were enrolled in this prospective observational study. RESULTS: During the average follow-up period of 24.3 months 5 patients died and 17 (16.7%) patients were hospitalised with the symptoms of heart failure; 75 (73.5%) patients were responders based on the previously defined criteria. Responders in the group of LBBB patients kept the significant difference in a computed variable (S1 + R6) - (S6 + R1) and R6/S6 ratio. Responders in non-LBBB patients kept the significant difference only in the height of R waves in V6. The R6/S6 ratio tended to be higher, but it did not reach a statistical significance. CONCLUSION: None of the tested ECG parameters stands out as an independent predictor of response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy, but some of them were different in responder-compared to the non-responder group. The amplitude of R wave in V6, higher R/S ratio in V6 and higher computed variable (S1 + R6) - (S6 + R1) may predict the likelihood of response to CRT therapy in both LBBB-patients and non-LBBB patients.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherID Design 2012/DOOEL Skopjeen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOpen Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectCardiac resynchronization therapy; Responders; non-responders; non-LBBB; Electrocardiography parametersen_US
dc.titleElectrocardiographic Parameters as Predictors of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3889/oamjms.2018.092-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://id-press.eu/mjms/article/download/oamjms.2018.092/1863-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://id-press.eu/mjms/article/download/oamjms.2018.092/1910-
dc.identifier.volume6-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.fpage297-
dc.identifier.lpage302-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
OAMJMS-6-297.pdf292.95 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

117
checked on Apr 25, 2024

Download(s)

13
checked on Apr 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.