Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/6938
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShapkova Kocevska, Katerina; Nedanovski, Peceen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-20T21:57:57Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-20T21:57:57Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/6938-
dc.description.abstractThe treatment of institutions as important determinant of economic prosperity in the countries around the world is not a novelty in economic literature. In the past few decades, examination of this topic has had considerable progress presented by increased interest in research and published work concerning understanding and definition of institutions, creating different classifications of institutional arrangements and evaluation of their impact on economic development, trade and investment. Douglas North, Oliver Williamson, Elinor Ostrom, Daron Acemoglu, Simeon Djankov, Steve Pejovich are a few of the scholars who have succeeded in their efforts to make institutional economics a separate discipline in economic science. By employing different criteria, many classifications of institutions have been made. In this presentation, the authors start from one of the most common classification of the institutions: formal versus informal institutions. By formal institutions, the formal rules of the game are assumed such as property rights, contracts, constitutions, conventions and laws. Informal institutions, on the other hand, represent the informal constraints of human behavior usually presented by different norms, values, language, customs, traditions etc. New institutional economics (NIE) places protection of private property and well defined property rights as one of the basic pillars of market economies. These formal institutions can be beneficial for economic prosperity in many ways. Stable and predictable institutional environment where ownership rights are respected and contracts are enforced stimulates the economic growth. These institutional arrangements have specific and predictable effects on the resource allocation, innovation stimulus and technological progress. Economic literature acknowledges different indicators as representative values for protection of property rights. Here within, two of them are examined: on one hand, the Rule of Law Index as a widely used indicator published by the World Bank in the Worldwide Governance Indicators Project, and on the other hand, the Legal System and Protection of Property Rights Indicator coming from Economic Freedom of the World Report published by the Frazer Institute. The sample of countries that are included in the study is consisted by selected transitional economies from Central and Southeast Europe. The authors run several OLS regression growth models in order to test the hypothesis that protected property rights are determinant of economic prosperity in the afore mentioned countries. The results of the research confirm the thesis that protection of property rights enhances institutional environment and kindles the economic growth.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAssociation of Economists and Managers of the Balkansen_US
dc.subjectproperty rights, formal institutions, economic freedom, economic growth.en_US
dc.titlePROPERTY RIGHTS AS FORMAL INSTITUTIONAL DETERMINANT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN SELECTED CENTRAL AND SOUTH-EUROPEAN COUNTRIESen_US
dc.typeProceeding articleen_US
dc.relation.conferenceInternational Scientific Conference EMAN 2017 Economics & Management: Globalization Challenges, Ljubljana, Slovenia March 30, 2017en_US
dc.identifier.fpage272-
dc.identifier.lpage283-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Law: Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
zbornik_radova_eman_2017_final_3.pdf20.75 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

92
checked on Jun 23, 2025

Download(s)

834
checked on Jun 23, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.