Ве молиме користете го овој идентификатор да го цитирате или поврзете овој запис: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/34920
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMihajlov, Kirilen_US
dc.contributor.authorTrajkovska dokikj, Elenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLabachevska gjatovska, Liljanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKostovski, Markoen_US
dc.contributor.authorJovchevski, Radomiren_US
dc.contributor.authorKovacheva-Trpkovska, Danicaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCvetanovska ilievski, Biljanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKrsteva, Nadicaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDimitrievski, Kristijanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-18T09:51:56Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-18T09:51:56Z-
dc.date.issued2025-11-25-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/34920-
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>Introduction: Clostridioides difficile is one of the most important intra-hospital pathogens. A few years ago, a new diagnostic algorithm for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) was introduced by ESCMID, stating that cultivation of the bacteria is not necessary for the diagnosis of CDI. Aim: We aimed to explore the role of the cultivation of faecal samples in the diagnosis of CDI. Materials and Methods: In 4 years, we have cultivated 80 different strains of C. difficile from as many patients. Initially, 1380 faecal samples from CDI-suspected patients were planted on selective and non-selective blood agar media and were accordingly incubated in order to isolate the strains. Quick immuno-chromatographic tests were performed on each faecal sample for detection of GDH (glutamate dehydrogenase) and C. difficile toxins A and B as well as on each confirmed C. difficile isolate (from one colony-toxins detection only). Results: In 14 of the 80 faecal samples from which the isolates originated, toxins A and B have not been detected. In 8 of these 14 strains, toxins A and B were detected only from the culture. Only 6 strains were confirmed as non-toxigenic. Conclusions: Although there was no statistical significance, the detection rate of C. difficile toxins A and B was higher from the culture than from the faecal samples by up to 10%. Cultivation of the samples for C. difficile could reduce the rate of false negative findings for CDI.</jats:p>en_US
dc.publisherUniversity Ss. Cyril and Methodius in Skopjeen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Morphological Sciencesen_US
dc.titleTHE ROLE OF THE FAECAL SAMPLES CULTIVATION IN THE DIAGNOSTICS OF CLOSTRIDIOIDES DIFFICILE INFECTIONen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.55302/jms2582191m-
dc.identifier.volume8-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.fpage191-
dc.identifier.lpage196-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Прикажи едноставен запис

Google ScholarTM

Проверете

Altmetric


Записите во DSpace се заштитени со авторски права, со сите права задржани, освен ако не е поинаку наведено.