Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/34585
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKhezzani, Bachiren_US
dc.contributor.authorNikolic, Jadrankaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBosilkovski, Mileen_US
dc.contributor.authorDimzova, Marijaen_US
dc.contributor.authorTsachev, Iliaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPetrova Baymakova, Magdalenaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-30T12:53:15Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-30T12:53:15Z-
dc.date.issued2025-03-24-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/34585-
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, there has been a significant increase in scientific productivity—an increased number of published original articles, reviews, short communications, case reports, and letters to the editor. In this regard, there is a large number of peer-reviewed journals in all fields of scientific knowledge, including in the field of biomedical sciences. Many studies indicate the existence of so-called journal editorial board bias and acknowledge the difficulty of eliminating it. We present our brief opinion on an important topic such as how publishing policy in some peer-reviewed journals leads to feelings of bias and inequality among authors and how to address this.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPensoft Publishersen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPharmaciaen_US
dc.subjectbiasen_US
dc.subjecteditorial policyen_US
dc.subjecthybrid journalsen_US
dc.subjectimpartialityen_US
dc.subjectpublishing modelen_US
dc.titleHybrid peer-reviewed journals and publishing model: Bias or impartiality in editorial policyen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3897/pharmacia.72.e140149-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.