Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/34447| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Dimitriev Emil | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-10T13:18:50Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-12-10T13:18:50Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | APA | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/34447 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract: There is almost no other common evolution of two phenomena that builds its uniqueness and specificity on overlapping and separating at the same time, like the relationship between politics and religion. The axis around which both phenomena exist is the man, or in more recent times from the aspect of their political awareness - the citizen. The specificity of the coexistence of politics and religion, among other things, is based on the complexity of individual phenomena, on their place and role in social processes. What politics and religion have in common is that their identity is based on the concrete complemented by the abstract. In other words, their scope of action moves beyond the limits of the rational and empirically verified. The key to explaining this challenge is that both phenomena have belief as spiritus movens in their essence. One of the characteristics of the historical evolution and mutual influence of politics and religion is the process of refining, i.e. building one’s own identity. In the beginning it was more difficult to make the demarcation between them to establish the special specificity and identity, today modern societies establish the distinction to the point of absolute incompatibility. Even the personification of the two phenomena was in the beginning in the same persons, i.e. in one person it had the legitimacy to communicate with God at the same time and rule the people. In the past, one person usually claimed the right to the secular and the sacred, today those roles are clearly differentiated in different persons. Taken at the national level, Macedonia throughout history has built its own specificity when it comes to the relationship between politics and religion. Its specificity is based on the historical fact that glorifies our country as the country through which Christianity was spread on European soil, and is one of the routes for the spread of Islam in Europe. Today’s contemporary reality characterizes it as a multiethnic and multiconfessional country. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Филозофски факултет | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Religious Dialogue and Cooperation | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | ;Vol 6 No 6 | - |
| dc.subject | Politics, religion, multiconfessionalism, secularism. | en_US |
| dc.title | POLITICS AND RELIGION | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.relation.conference | Second World Conference od Religious Dialogue and Cooperation | en_US |
| dc.identifier.fpage | 21 | - |
| item.grantfulltext | open | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Philosophy 05: Conference papers / Трудови од научни конференции | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Politics and Religion.docx | 166.13 kB | Microsoft Word XML | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.