Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/34139
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrndevska Stipanović, Viktorijaen_US
dc.contributor.authorČukanović, Jelenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAndonovski, Vlatkoen_US
dc.contributor.authorMinchev, Ivanen_US
dc.contributor.authorOrlović, Sašaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-14T09:55:14Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-14T09:55:14Z-
dc.date.issued2025-08-28-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/34139-
dc.description.abstractCreating places where urban life is better and of a higher quality is one of the main tasks of the modern society. These places are called ‘great places’ and urban parks have all the predispositions to be one of them. Due to the functions they perform, they are a necessary part of every city. Urban planning and landscape design are very important in the process of creating ‘great places’ for citizens. With their proper use, successful green spaces are created, which are functional and aesthetic at the same time. This is especially important since green areas in the urban environment are becoming less numerous. The subject of analysis in this paper is urban planning and landscape design through the example of Park Macedonia 1 in Skopje, North Macedonia. The park is analysed from different aspects (functionality, safety, plant species selection, layout of the plants and the use of basic principles of landscape design) to determine if this place is a ‘great place’, i.e. whether this place at the same time functional and aesthetic. The results show that Park Macedonia 1 is a ‘great place’; however, there are some gaps in its urban planning and landscape design. These gaps are reflected in the safety of the visitors and the functionality of the park, made in the process of plant species selection and landscape designing of the park, i.e. entrances and exits, layout of plants, incorrect use of focal points, and simplicity, rhythm and line as basic principles of landscape design. Analyses of Park Macedonia 1 in terms of urban planning and landscape design and the proposals for corrections can be used in the future design of ‘great places’ in urban areas like Skopje.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSEEFORen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSEEFORen_US
dc.subjectlandscape architecture; Park Macedonia; successful places; urban forestry; urban greenery; urban parksen_US
dc.titleThe Importance of Urban Planning and Landscape Design in the Process of Creating ‘Great Places’ for Citizens - Case study of Park Macedonia 1en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.15177/seefor.25-13-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Forestry-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Forestry-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Forestry-
Appears in Collections:Hans Em Faculty of Forest Sciences, Landscape Architecture and Environmental Engineering: Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
brndevska_stipanovic_SEEFOR.pdf7.56 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.