Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/33405| Title: | Invasive vs Conservative Management of Patients With Chronic Total Occlusion: Results From the ISCHEMIA Trial | Authors: | Bangalore, Sripal Mancini, G B John Leipsic, Jonathan Budoff, Mathew J Xu, Yifan Anthopolos, Rebecca Brilakis, Emmanouil S Dwivedi, Aeshita Spertus, John A Jones, Phil G Cho, Yoon Joo Mark, Daniel B Hague, Cameron J Min, James K Reynolds, Harmony R Elghamaz, Ahmed Nair, Rajesh Goplan Mavromatis, Kreton Gosselin, Gilbert Banerjee, Subhash Pejkov, Hristo Lindsay, Steven Grantham, J Aaron Williams, David O Stone, Gregg W O'Brien, Sean M Hochman, Judith S Maron, David J |
Issue Date: | 1-Apr-2025 | Publisher: | Elsevier BV | Journal: | Journal of the American College of Cardiology | Abstract: | Randomized trials of chronic total occlusion (CTO) revascularization vs medical therapy have yielded inconsistent results. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/33405 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.01.029 |
| Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles |
Show full item record
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.